• Blackout@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    We really need a functioning IRS, FTC and SEC. Just won’t happen if repugs are constantly elected.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    wait, I thought that it was covid and supply chains and such and actually that the profit motive encourages them to lower prices because competition and so on

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Amazon extracted $1 billion of wealth from Americans through secret price aising algorithm.”

  • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    What’s even wilder is that Amazon made no profit for the first 20 years of its existence, something the Feds claim makes Amazon even more dangerous as they spent considerable time building their network and have now turned on full money making mode.

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That was just creative accounting so they wouldn’t have to pay tax.

      Oh… this huge pile of revenue? That’s not profit. We’re reinvesting it into logistics and executive salaries. We lost money this year. -Amazon

  • rynzcycle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I remember an article ages ago that showed that Amazon, undoubtedly a monopoly, was on the right side of the law because of the “consumer welfare standard”.

    This was back when they were in growth mode and still unprofitable, but it seems obvious with this and their now record profits that they no longer pass that test. Time to break it up.

    • hh93@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s exactly why I don’t understand people defending Steam just because right now they are only using their monopoly against the developers but not against the users. One day that will change and move will have seen it coming.

      Same with Google abusing YouTube creators for years but only now when they start pushing against adblock people look for alternatives.

      Too many people are just lazy and complicit

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Valve isn’t publicly traded company, so Gaben is a BDFL.

        Who knows what happens after him. But sure, if there is any other game provider with comparable service, nobody will complain.

        It’s just there aren’t any

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    WASHINGTON, Nov 2 (Reuters) - Amazon.com (AMZN.O) used a series of illegal strategies to boost profits at its online retail empire, including an algorithm that pushed up prices U.S. households paid by more than $1 billion, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission detailed in a new court filing on Thursday.

    … Amazon used Project Nessie to extract more than a billion dollars directly from Americans’ pocketbooks," the FTC said.

    Amazon spokesperson Tim Doyle said the FTC “grossly mischaracterizes” the pricing tool and the company stopped using it several years ago.

    Amazon paused the algorithm during its Prime Day sales events and the holiday shopping season when there was more media and customer attention on the online retailer, the FTC said.

    The FTC called Nessie’s algorithm an “unfair method of competition” because it manipulates other online stores into raising prices, allowing Amazon to do the same.

    In the complaint, the FTC noted that Amazon does not allow other big online stores such as Walmart.com to sell on its platform.


    The original article contains 661 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        No.

        Because I don’t trust the FTC fines to be enough to discourage Jeff’s actions.

        An expensive class action would help hold him accountable.

        Plus, he got rid of the mandatory arbitration agreement. So Amazon is open to a class action on this as far as I know.

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m surprised that there are still people who are surprised about this price hiking algorithm. Have you never seen weirdly fluctuating proves on Amazon before?!