• astroturds@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I swear people that don’t watch trek think it’s just about lasers and technobabble.

    I know people that refused to watch Discovery because ‘they made it all woke and now it’s all about women’.

      • Rhabuko@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. I don’t watch Discovery anymore because I couldn’t stand a lot of the characters but it had absolute nothing to do with progressive views.

      • techno156@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s got a very TOS-style of writing and story to it.

        I remember seeing a fair few people pitch a fit about the Burn, for example, even though “angry man has a tantrum and nearly blows up the universe”, and “child with godlike powers” are common TOS plots.

        They tried something new, which I don’t mind them for, but I don’t think it mixed well with people being used to more TNG-styles plots, and the writing not being that great. Still, it managed to help kickstart the modern revival of Trek, and gave us (non-wheelchair) Captain Pike, so it wasn’t all bad.

  • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Star Trek in 1966: *has a bridge crew containing a black female, Russian man, and faaaabulous Japanese man, each of whom holds the rank of full Lieutenant on their own abundant merits*

  • JelloBrains@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate this reaction to removal they want, I’m a big fan of the placement card at the start of these things that say “What you are about to see is wrong and shouldn’t have been done,” but not that removal of the content. I think it’s way more powerful to put that content warning placard before a show from the '90s as proof there are still things that need to be done and it’s not a “distant” past thing.

    Edit, I guess '80s for this episode.

      • JelloBrains@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Frakes recently renewed his call for the episode “Code of Honor” from season 1 to be completely removed from reruns, home video, and steaming platforms. He made the call in the past. So while they might not ever remove it, some people would like it to be removed.

        “But I was told or I was under the impression that it had rubbed so many people the wrong way that it was pulled. I think they should take it out of the rotation. I think it is a great time to make that kind of – as small as it is – to make that kind of a statement would be fabulous.”

        Also, I just realized I posted this on the completely wrong article that I thought I was, I thought I was posting to a different topic about Frakes’ request to remove the episode after finding out it was on Paramount’s streaming service.

        • shoggoth@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          which episode was that? pulling it is a dumb decision. just put the damn thing in context. i’m not going to pretend I didn’t do something stupid decades ago just to try to look good now. people (and franchises) grow and change.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Code of Honour

            A.k.a “Dark men from Space Africa steal our white women”

            In fairness, apparently when the episode was first pitched, they wanted the alien race to be reptiles, but it was subsequently changed to just be black people wearing tribal African clothing.