Well, at least you’re honest about being against free speech.

Nobody is born a Muslim either, yet pointing out the hatefulness of Islam is considered racism.

That’s not what the distinction is about. The important thing is whether you want to shut them down because of what opinion they’re expressing, or how they’re expressing it.

Nobody is forcing you to read anyone’s comments on Facebook.

If they’re disturbing you from working, that’s an issue independent from the message they’re expressing, so freedom of expression does not apply.

They do not curate the content that’s posted there. Just because someone wrote something on Facebook does not mean Facebook endorses their opinion, just like sending someone an e-mail does not mean that your e-mail host endorses whatever you sent.

If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all. —Noam Chomsky

No, that’s not what “censorship” means.

You have it backward. Censorship is what creates echo chambers.

I’m looking forward to whenever someone decides that your beliefs are “hate speech” and suddenly you’ll be the one supporting free speech.

A social site doesn’t publish anything, it’s just a medium for users to communicate.

A social media site is not a publisher.

Moderator groups that users can choose between.

So preventing underage people from seeing NSFW content is oppression?

Copyright is bad, but if it exists, it should apply equally to everyone, not just megacorporations.

Make two Reddit accounts, one saying “I love trans people” and one saying “I hate trans people”. I bet the latter will get banned first.

How does writing a comment on Facebook negatively affect anyone’s rights?

Your calculation is assuming that the input images are statistically independent, which is certainly not the case (otherwise the model would be useless for generating new images)

By this logic, you can copy a copyrighted imege as long as you decrease the resolution, because the new image does not contain all the information in the original one.

Ads allow YouTube to be used by billions worldwide

They’re literally giving us more reasons to use an ad blocker.