• doyun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In Korea there’s a brand called No Brand. I like shopping there cause they have a few good deals and western snacks that don’t get stocked in normal markets.

  • Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I can’t seem to find any evidence online but there did used to be a supermarket in the UK in the 80s/90s called ‘No Frills’ and all their products were also just black and white packaging.

  • darksiderbun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The reason they said Canada is because we have a brand here called No Name in yellow packaging doing that exact thing. It’s Loblaw’s store brand.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There was a UK brand that do the same thing although it is black text on a white background and they do have a thin blue line as well, for extra excitement.

      It’s incredibly cheap stuff and not quality at all, but I suppose it is good if you want to save money. I do enjoy that a bottle of their vodka is just labelled “alcohol”.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The US did this for a while from the later 70s until the mid 80s. White-label packaging, with just the name of the foodstuff or item printed on it, in its own separate aisle. Most of these evolved later on into store brands.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Loblaws does. That includes no frills, Zehrs, Real Canadian super store, Dominion, Maxi, T & T, Wholesale Club and many others.

        You would be hard pressed not to find no name. YAY 3 WAY MONOPOLY ON FOOD!

        • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Well, this is the first time I’m hearing about a Control show. That being said… I have little hope for it. I feel like somethings should just remain games. Not everything needs to be translated to another form of media and I don’t see Control being able to pull off the same level of awe and wonder in a show that it does in a game.

          Now the sequel…

          hnng.

          • oo1@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It always reminded me of the wierder bits of twin peaks or something anyway.

            I sill never got past that crazy professor lady running around in some big cave thing firing grenades everywhere , so i dont need a sequel until i get more skills.

          • BossDj@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The track record is getting good, though. Fallout and Last of Us nailed it. Cyberpunk and Arcane were pretty awesome, too. Maybe they’ve figured out the formula

            • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Last of Us, Cyberpunk and Arcane are nowhere on my radar of shows that I plan on ever watching so I can’t speak to those. Don’t have anything against it. Just doesn’t spark any interest. Fallout I’ve been meaning to watch for a while but just keep autistically shrinking back into Star Trek lmao

              • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                At the very least watch Cyberpunk. It’s magnificent. But I think it helps that the setting and themes have never just been gaming-centric and the show isn’t actually based on the most recent game.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks of reminding me of the awesome premise of the Oldest House.

      “Better not bring any unnecessary cultural artifacts into the reality shifting place, so that whatever is in here doesn’t have anything to latch onto.”

  • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    would anyone actually like that? how am i supposed to know anything about a product if it’s just called “chips”?? what’s the flavor, texture, what does it look like?

    maybe partially transparent packaging would be nice, though

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, no one could like that. Not like there is a whole set of us that basically live off the stuff or anything…

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          The US doesn’t seem to do this much to my irritation when I visited but pretty much every other country the crisps are colour-coded for flavour although there seems to be no international consistency on this.

          For example at least in the UK blue means cheese and onion (and therefore disgusting), red means salt, green means salt and vinegar, and pink means prawn cocktail.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, that one is odd. Some have a band of colour though. I think its when there are flavours.

          • dustycups@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I like the Canadian one better. If its going to be simple then be simple.
            I’m assuming the contents are all unremarkable commodities.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Interestingly I (and many others) have noticed that the no name (and other store brands) are often better then the “name” brand stuff.

              For example I would say KD is worse then store brand, and the store brand crackers are waaaay better then the name brand now (they seem to now over toast them).

  • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you grew up poor in America this is what government issued food stuffs looked like. They realized having this stuff was humiliating to the people that needed it and replaced it completely with snap cards you can use to buy whatever. Government cheese and peanut butter and milk were big staples.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    Once upon a time in England we had “No Frills” which was basically exactly that