The Chrome team says they’re not going to pursue Web Integrity but…

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team “heard your feedback.” I’m sure that’s true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

  • TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I absolutely do not trust Chrome or the google team. It does not make me feel any better the only barrier to them trying to ruin a internet a bit is some backlash.

  • dirtbiker509@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to believe that enough of us actually stopped using chrome and switched to Firefox the day they made that announcement that swayed them… But in reality I’m sure it was just the bad press and they’re going to try to find a different more sneaky way to do the same shit.

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you actually stop using chrome on android? Because every link I click it opens in their webview app which is chrome

      • dirtbiker509@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah there is a setting and now when I click links it opens in Firefox. But if you use the Google search widget it still opens in chrome, which is to be expected I guess.

        • Calavera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not only a problem for google search, most apps uses webview to handle web links. They can do like Voyager and have a option to open the default browser instead, but most of them don’t bother with that.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Advert People are easily startled, but they’ll soon be back, and in greater numbers.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re just starting it smaller scale. Within a year it’ll be pushed out to everyone broadly.

    • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is literally going to be what they did for FLoC. Basically release it as topics.

      Google absolutely cannot stop tracking everyone at this point. I’m pretty sure they’ve put the entire house on the bet to track people more and do everything to ensure that Google Chrome tracks every aspect of your web browsing experience.

      So while WEI is dead, I think Google’s boat is so far out to sea now that it’s either try this again a bit more gently or watch the ship sink. Everyone said FLoC was dead and they absolutely put it into the web browser with Topics. Nothing convinces me this is any different, they are absolutely going to, and I dare say have an existential need to, put this shit in everyone’s browser.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    K, I’m still not using Google search engine anymore. And once I find a replacement for any other Google services and devices I have, it’s out with those as well.

    • xrtxn@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I replaced gmail with protonmail and everything else with nextcloud. Couldn’t go back.

      • Keith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        After a lot of privacy switching I finally did try NextCloud, but I couldn’t get port forwarding to work on my Internet and gave up… For now

        • xrtxn@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are probably behind a nat. I contacted my isp and they disabled it, since it works perfectly!

          • Keith@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What do you mean nat? For me there is an app with an option (apparently no other way) and it didn’t worj

            • xrtxn@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Compare what your router reports as ip and compare what your public ip is. If its not the same then that means you are behind a nat(?)(or something else) and you can’t port forward now.

  • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The “don’t be evil” motto was replaced with “don’t be evil, but greedy and posessive is okay”

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have not followed this stuff very closely. Here’s a question. This article says:

    People took issue with how the Web Integrity API would bring DRM to the open web.

    Has there not been DRM on the web for many years by now for videos?

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This would bring DRM to everything on the internet. If you wanted to get grandma’s apple brown betty recipe even the text would be unavailable unless your browser and the page agree that it should happen. And the browser wouldn’t give the OK unless the page is advertiser friendly, and the page won’t give the greenlight if you’ve blocked any ads recently.