Windows 11 adds native support for RAR, 7-Zip, Tar and other archive formats thanks to open-source library::undefined

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder how long before I can send someone a .7z file without “hurr durr I can’t open this”.

    Like, OpenDocument support exists in Office 2003 and I still encounter those who can’t open a .odt file.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tared files are cancer and should never be used for any reason.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wtf are you on… It’s literally just a way to turn a bunch of files into one. You can feed it into a makefile and make a single file installer like nothing. Apps are based on the concept. It’s a key technology for all sorts of applications

          It’s so simple it works for anything, anywhere… It’s like saying virtualization is cancer. It’s often annoying when you have to interact with it directly, but everything we love is built on it

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tared compressed files are bad archives. You can’t retrieve a single file without unpacking everything. You can’t add new files or replace contents of existing files without unpacking and repacking everything. They are just very outdated and have poor design. There are no reasons to use them.

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re bad for storing files, but a great way to turn a folder into a file.

              Installers don’t need to be modified or used in part

              • Aux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why do you continue talking about installers? That’s not the reason people invented archives and compression.

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ok, you have this design, which every installer in the world uses. Some are more compressed, some are signed, some bootstrap a downloader - but at the end of the day, every downloadable installer uses the same basic concept. From Windows installers to dmg to flatpacks to app bundles - same basic idea.

                  A tarball is a bunch of files laid end to end, it’s good for one thing and one thing only - treating a bunch of files as one. It’s great at that… If you want to compress it, it’s not context aware enough to let you decrepit them individually - they’re encrypted as one file

                  It’s a bad way to store compressed archived info, I’ll grant you that, but it’s a great way to share a program or library to reproduce a bunch of files that make no sense to handle individually.

                  For another example, what about the layers of a photo editing program? What about the individual tracks in a music editing program?

                  It’s an incredibly useful pattern that is used in countless ways. It’s simple, easy to implement, and used everywhere to great effect