• abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t a firestick basically a chromecast? I mean, google is a shitty company in matters about privacy or ethics, but amazon isn’t much better

    • Blackout@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can cast to my internet-disabled TV anything to it, including pirate streaming sites with no ads. 20 years ago I ran a hdmi from my desktop and used a wireless touchpad to load downloaded stuff. It truly is the golden age of piracy

    • yukichigai@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re more like AndroidTV boxes with a full menu and HDMI-CEC support, only they came out back in the day when Chromecasts were just for casting. They were also dirt cheap; unfortunately that’s because they were made with bargain-basement parts which often failed or started to overheat easily a few months in.

    • passepartout@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have been built onto android until now, but i read that they wanted to ditch that and make their own os from scratch

    • Skimmer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, Chromecasts are much better than Fire TV’s, due to the more control you have over them and how easy it is change the launcher vs. Amazon actively preventing it. Basically same price and budget as well. Plus Google running a newer version of Android in general vs. Amazon’s, etc. Chromecasts are probably lesser of the two evils imo.