• Dandroid@dandroid.app
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Dang, it’s almost like it was worth all the research money the government crammed into it in the long run, unlike what my dad said to me a million times.

  • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is this just the cost per raw Watt produced?

    Is it a fair comparison vs conventional fuel-based power (coal/nuclear)?

    Ie: if you wanted to build a plant capable of producing continuously, 24 hours a day, you would need some multiple of solar panels to produce an excess during daylight, and storage.

    Not that drastic drops in solar costs aren’t bad, just what would the cost-per-watt be if you had to power an average city on just solar for a year?

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Look at the subtitle on the chart, it’s levelized cost over the generator’s lifetime. So not including storage for any intermittent source like solar or wind

  • VegaLyrae@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Without saying anything about politics, environment, or source:

    Why, for the love of Satan, does this graph have only 2 data points per source?

    Why use a line chart 📉 for that?

    This is clear bar chart territory 📊.