Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoMicrosoft to Revive Nuclear Plant on Three Mile Island to Handle AI Processingwww.pcmag.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1259arrow-down13
arrow-up1256arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft to Revive Nuclear Plant on Three Mile Island to Handle AI Processingwww.pcmag.comArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareQuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down17·2 months agoThis thing can’t continue.
minus-squareBearOfaTime@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down3·2 months agoWhy? It had a proper “fail-safe” incident. It functioned as intended.
minus-squareQuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoYes, it’s safe and all but using a whole nuclear power plant for AI is a waste of resources.
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·2 months agoThey intended for it to partially melt down?
minus-squareArxCyberwolf@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·2 months agoDon’t twist their words. The plant, when faced with a meltdown incident, was able to shut down safely with no injuries or detrimental effects to anyone, as intended. The plant then operated safely without incident for another 4 decades.
This thing can’t continue.
Why?
It had a proper “fail-safe” incident. It functioned as intended.
Yes, it’s safe and all but using a whole nuclear power plant for AI is a waste of resources.
They intended for it to partially melt down?
Don’t twist their words. The plant, when faced with a meltdown incident, was able to shut down safely with no injuries or detrimental effects to anyone, as intended. The plant then operated safely without incident for another 4 decades.