alessandro@lemmy.ca to

PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 2 months ago

Intel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recover

www.tomshardware.com

151

Intel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recover

www.tomshardware.com

alessandro@lemmy.ca to

PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 2 months ago

Too big to fail.

Chat

BonerMan@ani.social
link
fedilink
arrow-up
1
arrow-down
5·
2 months ago
By that definition Intel isn’t manufacturing either, its foxcon that manufacturers for them.
- Auli@lemmy.ca
  link
  fedilink
  arrow-up
  3
  arrow-down
  1·
  2 months ago
  Huh Intel has its own fabs.

PC Gaming@lemmy.ca

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !pcgaming@lemmy.ca

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

381 users / day
1.31K users / week
4.85K users / month
9.86K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
8.78K subscribers
1.18K Posts
9.97K Comments
Modlog