More than 5,600 artists signed an open letter protesting the auction, saying that the works used AI models that are trained on copyrighted work.
A representative for Christie’s shared a statement about the issue. “From the beginning, two things have been true about the art world: one, artists are inspired by what came before them, and two, art can spark debate, discussion, and controversy,” the statement reads. “The discussions around digital art, including art created using AI technology, are not new and in many ways should be expected. Many artists – Pop artists, for example – have been the subject of similar discussions. Having said that, Christie’s, a global company with world-class experts, is uniquely positioned to explore the relatively new and ever-changing space of digital art: the artists, collectors, market and challenges.”
When there is so much AI slop out in the world that it makes you question whether something is AI or not. That’s definitely erasing human creativity.
yeah what it leads to in practice is the original art style of the victim being scrutinized due to “looking like AI art”.
like, no, the AI actually looks like this art style because so many techbros stole it without crediting the artist and now everybody thinks that the style belongs to the AI overlords.
it’s happened to me a few times where I see gorgeous art and I second-guess myself for a split second when I see certain digital art styles.
that is a horrible experience to have as an art enjoyer and concerning how few so-called “tech enthusiasts” actually value the human beings that led to them enjoying art.
they’ve been so brainwashed by AI propaganda and bootstraps ideology that they can’t imagine a future that’s worse than today because corporate tech futurism so often labels cyberpunk futures as utopia