Yep. They even made a new 3310.
Yep. They even made a new 3310.
Uh, they DO still make dumb phones. And people still buy them.
Minetest. The game is way more open and customisable, and you can add in whatever rulesets you like.
And how do they make their money?
Because hosting shit yourself isn’t free, and most people aren’t up for taking financial losses for their projects.
To be more specific, you can, it’s just an esoteric piece of shit mechanism that’s way more complicated than it needs to be.
https://framedsc.com/GeneralGuides/steam_update_guide.htm
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3232095313
and the government would have to explain precisely why they decided to ban all Google services over a song about freedom.
They wouldn’t explain shit. This is an authoritarian government we’re talking about; they have near total control of what information gets to their populace.
More likely they’d just accuse Google of supporting terrorism, and make a show of raiding their offices and jailing their local executives.
I don’t think the people in charge would last long if that happened, considering how integral Google’s services are to many people’s lives.
This is China we’re talking about. Chinese equivalents to nearly every big tech service are more than present and accounted for, even often preferred by the local populace. Hong Kong is a little different, but the CCP still exerts near total control there.
Well, you pulled out of your ass that I’ve never been to the UK when I lived there for nearly 30 years, you pulled out of your ass that I’ve never actually seen public infrastructure being used by the homeless, which I obviously have given how long I’ve lived there.
So now that we’ve established that my accusations of you pulling stuff out of your ass is well founded, do you have anything to say that isn’t an attempt at setting up a straw man or ‘no u’?
It is literally either follow this law or cease operations here. Both would end in the song being blocked anyway.
Mind you, I wish we were that level of strict when it came to our data privacy laws.
My “can” includes infrastructure that I’ve actually seen being used by the homeless and setups that can feasibly be used by the homeless.
Stop pulling things out of your ass. It doesn’t make your argument stronger.
I’ve lived up and down the UK for nearly 30 years. In both the north and the south you can basically bump into public spaces that can be used by the homeless. Just because your city ain’t got them doesn’t mean it’s the same for the rest of the UK.
Until they make the wrong call and it bites them on the ass.
Yeah but they’re called talent for a reason. The senior talent are generally better than the juniors at what they do.
Bro wtf are you on about? There’s tons of public spaces in the UK, cities included.
Slippery slope? All it does is provide an enforcement option for orgs who don’t want people begging on their property.
This company wasn’t exactly targeted. It could have happened to literally anyone.
That’s unusually really cool of them! Mad props!
True but this is also a tiny ass town. Many of the negative effects of tourism are felt much more strongly in smaller communities.
Because tourists can end up inadvertently majorly fucking over locals in a huuuge way. Barcelona is a good example of what happens when tourism is left unimpeded.
That’s how it used to be used, but has since been reclaimed. It’s safe to use.