They created their Privacy Badger extension + spread their DnT philosophy, regardless if it is helpful or not.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/one-answer-facebook-problem-block-its-tracking-technologies
Talked a lot about the leak
- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/11/after-facebook-leaks-here-what-should-come-next
- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/why-we-didnt-make-fix-my-facebook-privacy-settings-tool
- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/facebooks-attack-research-everyones-problem
- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/12/data-privacy-scandals-and-public-policy-picking-speed-2018-year-review
- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/04/deletefacebook-or-not-deletefacebook-not-question
Direct response
- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/one-answer-facebook-problem-block-its-tracking-technologies
- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/04/what-we-want-learn-zuckerbergs-congressional-testimonies-week
I think they responded a lot to Facebook, the entire scandal and started some campaigns to sue Zuck and co.
I find such accusations without anything behind pretty harsh.
Eff has some campaigns running and did so in the past. Campaign that people paid for and they were pretty transparent because they report about all won and lost battles. They have social media, you can ask and contact them over there too. Not sure what your definition of transparent is.
Can we go back to topic, I think the Cambridge thing is already over and Facebook had his worst year in 2021. I do not like hijacking threads like this. I also do not like to smear someones entire reputation based on one or two things some people did, this is not how things should be handled. Name someone without any flaws, that would be real news and a big bummer. If you dig for dirt you always find some, on every side.
I do not backup EFF on every move they do or did, it also was only an example on who you can support with eg donations.
Now tell me what campaigns you running as private person … oh whoops none… Full circle.