Collatz_problem [comrade/them]

You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society, private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the immense majority of society.

In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend.

But in a democracy the voters choose what they want, whether you like their choice or not.

The problem is who controls the choices they get.

Competition is won by those who extract profit now. Those who refrain from profiting even if they want to preserve the ability to profit in the future for whatever reason lose competition and are removed from making decisions. So only the most shortsighted capitalists remain.

Being able to extract profit is more important to individual capitalist than maintaining the system in the long run. See: climate change.

It will be even funnier if Britain rejoins and then immediately leaves again.

Critical support for comrade Musk in his war on twitter.

Lmao, is this ДМБ reference?

AI chatbots should be near I Ching divination.

Less software bloat.

0.000000001%

This implies the existence of 100 billion Android users, that is roughly 13 times the number of people alive.