• 0 Posts
  • 142 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 19th, 2024

help-circle








  • We live in a techno feudalism, it’s not a democracy, it’s no longer Capitalism. It’s Capitalism almost completely mediated through elite technocrats. The only freedom we have, the only potential for regaining control, is boycotting via massive, well organized, well understood, well conducted unsubscription programs, and campaigns. Lightening fast protest statements where we control who we fund, which services we use, and which we deny and defund by taking our usage data away (and their services away from us which takes discipline). Denying them data to sell, and profits/subscriptions.

    This is the future politics we have to start discussing with others, the idea we have to spread, as it’s currently the only way to have a say within this current state of techno feudalism.

    If we don’t we will end up in subscription model nations, living as slaves, with end user agreements, rather than human rights.



  • It is a closed loop, but the paper treats it as if it’s an open loop, and counts all water use for the building, as well as all the water that went into creating any equipment used… and the water that escapes power plants in powering the buildings… it also includes any other buildings that might house related services. Here is the original “study” which is about what maths could be done given the above assumptions:

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03271

    In short, it has nothing to do with reality, and is more just an attempt at the authors to get their names out there (on bad science that the media is interested in publicizing for click bait reasons).


  • The study that suggests 10-50 interactions with ChatGPT evaporates a whole bottle of water, doesn’t account for the fact that cooling systems are enclosed…

    …and that “study” is based on a bunch of assumptions, which include evaporation from local power plants, as well as the entire buildings GPT’s servers are located in. It does this as if one user is served at a time, and the organizations involved (such as microsoft) do nothing BUT serve one use at a time. So the “study” (which isn’t peer reviewed and never got published) pretends those buildings don’t also serve bing, or windows, or all the other functions microsoft is involved with. It instead assumes whole buildings at microsoft are dedicated to serving just one user of ChatGPT at a time.

    It also includes the manufacture of all the serve and graphics cards equipment, even though the former was used before ChatGPT, and will be used for other things as well… and the latter is only used in training.

    You can check the study out yourself here:

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03271

    It’s completely junk. Worthless. Even uses a click bait title, and keeps talking about “the secret water foot print” as if it’s uncovering some conspiracy. It’s bunk science.

    P.S It also doesn’t seem to understand that the bulk of GPT’s training was a one time cost, paid in 2021, with one smaller update in 2023.


  • Israel planned to bomb US and UK targets in Egypt in a false flag called the Lavon Affair.

    Israel tried to sink the USS Liberty (killing US citizens).

    Israel stole Uranium from US Uranium stock piles when the US said they weren’t allowed to have a nuclear program (eg. They started one anyway with stolen US Uranium).

    Israel isn’t some friend to the US. It never has been. Lashing out at the UK in defence of Netanyahu’s war crimes is just part of the self-hatred America shows for its self in the name of Israel.

    America - who soon under Trump may halt all support of Ukraine and leave Europe to fend for its self against Russia (but probably won’t due to other powers that be).

    The point is, America keeps threatening its European allies in the name of people doing war crimes (Putin and Netanyahu)… It’s starting to look like; How you say - an axis of evil.


  • It will be preserved and replaced within 70 years. I mean, imagine if the Internet was around in the 50s, and we had an AI trained from it.

    It would be a novel curiosity, but not the one we go to for up to date information.

    So “our” LLM that we’re encoded on will too be updated and replaced.

    Not much of an afterlife. Language might not even be the same in 50 years, no cap skibidi.







  • If you want to know the actual reason is that Roddenberry planned for his wife (Marjel Barrett) to be Number 1 in TOS and basically have the ship deeply dependent on her. The Studio canned the idea, and she was relegated to playing nurse Chapel.

    So TNG was a chance to revive the idea with Counsellor Troi looking after the whole ship via her job, but this too was downgraded so she was just another character on the show rather than the center of the crew’s lives.