FuckyWucky [none/use name]

My point exactly, it should be $600 for the Pro XL.

Pixels don’t even have that. Chinese phones give you silicon carbon batteries atleast.

But really I don’t think pixels are bad if it cost like $500-600

Pixel people cope saying it has “features”. I like the Pixel UI and all but it’s not worth it for what is a mid range phone priced at flagship.

Try disabling it with this, maybe?

https://github.com/MuntashirAkon/AppManager

People are employed at these places, people spend money, workers get income etc.

Its straight up included in the GDP figures as it’s a service.

It’s downloading for me. You might have some port issue. Make sure you forward incoming port in router.

Regardless I’ll seed it.

I’ll add it to my seedbox at least.

if the hash matches, yes. if you have the magnet, dm me i will seed it.

“Nationalisation would cost upwards of £100bn that we’d have to take away from the National Health Service and schools to give to the owners of the companies that are polluting,” said Reed.

you know you could run a larger deficit, or cut wasteful military spending. i do not think this is about Brexit they don’t want to invest, the private sector doesn’t want to invest.

also it wasn’t very good pre-brexit either.

How about banning large corps from issuing shares abroad? Britain is too financialized. There is no need to pump more people’s money into shares.

In her Mansion House speech to City leaders, Rachel Reeves is expected to consider cutting tax breaks for people parking their savings in cash ISAs, in a bid to encourage more investment in stocks and shares.

People parking their savings in stocks doesn’t increase investments in real sector. In long run without a Government sector, increases in private profits comes from private investment financed by bank loans created from nothing (inside money).

That applies to new equity (shares) as well, the money to buy newly issued shares (IPO) must come from retained earnings (which come from previous investments or govt deficit and is limited in amount), or bank money creation (which is constrained by bank’s willingness to lend).

Funny how the land of Keynesian economics is now implementing the most braindead monetarist economic policies. Acting as if shuffling numbers around does anything.

Edit: I believe the hope is that this will inflate the prices of shares, which can then be used as collateral to get loans for cheap from private banks. But then that money is unlikely to be used for real investment instead just speculation.

Central government finances itself. It doesn’t need tax revenue or such payments from the rich.

Close the loophole.

For flagship they should’ve gone with a flagship cpu. Ik it’s not that different, but there is no reason.

I think uncertainty of employment is a huge issue. Enact a right to employment law.

One off transfers aren’t enough, there has to be consistent income stream. The hours of the work offered under this law must be flexible.

Of course, none of that is going to happen if the Government has a neoliberal mindset.

Farage is indistinguishable from current “Labour” Government in that they both support austerity. Which leftist is he trying to woo. He will kick out all the immigrants, then what? Will life improve? No in fact it’ll be worse.

To pay for it, Farage is promising to end the government’s commitment to net zero, scrap diversity and inclusion schemes and stop housing asylum seekers in hotels or houses of multiple occupancy. Economists said his working was riddled with errors, such as including private sector investment as part of his calculation for how much he could save by ending environmental spending.

Again, why should he “pay for” tax cuts? Does he fear being ousted like Truss even if he’s elected?

“Reform’s economic plan means either an explosion in borrowing, pushing up mortgage rates or swingeing cuts in public services like the NHS,” Ashworth said. “Given this is terrain Labour want to fight an election on, Reform have just walked into a trap and Labour strategists will be rubbing their hands with glee.’

Yes blow up the borrowing. As for mortgage rates, build public housing.

Of course, none of them are going to do anything. Not even the Greens or SNP or whatever, they are all afraid of the market gods.

otp.landian.vip

Fiscal deficits are not completely discretionary, there are automatic stablizers and balances of private and foreign sectors. And no, she doesnt have to raise taxes or cut spending, she can let the deficit be wherever it is.

if you want iptorrents invite message me, it may have what you are looking for.

Why is private sector doing nuclear energy? It’ll take large amounts of subsidies anyway since the private sector doesn’t do anything if they don’t forsee profits. Might as well have it in the public sector which doesn’t have to worry about monetary profits.

I don’t think much is happening in UK with regards to anything productive like wind or nuclear so long as the Government doesn’t do stuff. Starmer is servile to finance capital interests. He is more interested in seeing the line go up.

Yep. The bump has always been large but I meant the arrangement itself.

Xiaomi 15 Ultra

Xiaomi 13 Ultra

New battery tech with that 6000mah.

I agree with the comments though, camera does look ugly.