![](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/f899d995-e837-4f83-bd4f-23980c4b990c.jpeg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Every generation needs to learn what microsoft is all over again, but they only learn the hard way.
Every generation needs to learn what microsoft is all over again, but they only learn the hard way.
yes https://earthsky.org/space/first-wooden-satellite-wisa-woodsat/ this is the first one built by japanese researchers, that explains the convoluted headline :D
deleted by creator
Anybody know if it is hard to make a synthetic voice, just like you can make a synthetic face or synthetic music? Or is that the point: that a synthetic voice ended up sounding like her?
deleted by creator
Backdoors are bad, 'mkay?
Apparently, that causes radio interference, but I don’t think it lasts that long (days to hours)
deleted by creator
Nothing, but then you could patent it and license it to anyone but elon :) are you motivated yet?
If after all this shit we end up with retarded AI and lose libgen in the process, we’ll end up with less than we started with…
China did it…https://www.youku.tv/ probably the EU could do it too, if it cared about owning its own critical infrastructure.
At this point, it is just part of the corporate innovation cycle: first you make money by creating better products, once the tech matures and the gains in engineering are marginal, you move focus to sales and try to gain market. Then when the market is saturated, you move your focus to finance, aquisitions and cost-trimming.
From this pov, it looks like google got caught flat-footed (when it was moving from sales to finance) by a tech breakthrough and seems to be in “manage the shit out of this” mode, when now what they needed was to go back to an engineering focus, but by now it is too late, because the company already alienated the most dedicated engineers and can’t get them back while still in sales/finance focus.
why is this better than just icinerating it for baseload power? That is the only truly safe way to dispose of plastic, plus pyrolisis adds an extra step, which costs more energy.
I’m comparing Malthus’ overpopulation to a white supremacist who supposedly invented the tragedy of commons. Sounds similar. Overpopulation can happen in some societies e.g. Easter Island, but is not everywhere the cause of most ills.
deleted by creator
Remember kids, never place buttons for a service on a remote if you don’t know if the remote will last longer than said service :)
It can be a reductive approach if you look at the world exclusively through those glasses, but the effect the expression alludes to exists in very specific circumstances e.g. street cleaning, overfishing, pollution. It’s like saying overpopulation is not a thing because that social darwinist Malthus was the first to refer to it.
…because of anxiety from doomscrolling and notifications