![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/a64z2tlDDD.png)
Please don’t color part of a word blue and part of a word black
Please don’t color part of a word blue and part of a word black
Like, could you imagine this article ending on a ‘dont touch this dumpster fire of a stock’ line? Conde nast would not allow that.
The article was so glowing at the end it almost swayed me until that realization
@schamppu a friend is running a marathon this weekend. Any chance they can get into beta by then?
You can get jelly that’s a lot less sugar than the cheap stuff. As for kids - I’m a firm believer in letting kids butch and moan for a few days and after that they get used to it and eat it. Just take the time investment to save yourself some hassle later on. Or tell them to make their own.
Micro plastic stew
600k for causing a mass migration. Fuck that and fuck CEO compensation in general
Tiny rager is funny
Halfling barbarian
Nobody gets seconds until everyone has had a plate
You can’t just drop that without details. Plan name. State. Monthly premium. Obamacare subsidy or no.
I’ve played a night so far and prob got my $26 of value in the next few days.
It’s fun and think I can spend some time on it. What else is there to ask?
Also, you know there’s going to be mods to add licensed chars to the game so that should add another level of fun when you can ride Thomas the train to run over legally distinct pikachus
Isn’t this the longest lad game ever? If it’s something only the doe hards are actually going to get to, I could see locking it behind more $
I can take the entirety of Harry Potter, run it thru chat gpt to ‘rewrite in the style of Lord of the rings’, and rename the characters. Assuming it all works correctly, everything should be reworded. But, I would get deservedly sued into the ground.
News articles might be a different subject matter, but a blatant rewording of each sentence, line by line, still seems like a valid copyright claim.
You have to add context or nuance or use multiple sources. Some kind of original thought. You can’t just wholly repackage someone else’s work and profit off of that.
I doubt they did the ‘rewrote this text like this’ prompt you state. This would just come out in any trial if it was that simple and would be a giant black mark on the paper for filing a frivolous lawsuit.
If we rule that out, then it means that gpt had article text in its knowledge base, and nyt was able to get it to copy that text out in its response.
Even that is problematic. Either gpt does this a lot and usually rewrites it better, or it does that sometimes. Both are copyright offenses.
Nyt has copyright over its article text, and they didn’t give license to gpt to reproduce it. Even if they had to coax the text out thru lots of prompts and creative trial and error, it still stands that gpt copied text and reproduced it and made money off that act without the agreement of the rights holder.
There’s a ton of those out there and they don’t offer a lot more than what the steam deck can already do.
Black mirror shit. Who thinks reading an empathy script from an AI model is a good idea?
I’m more upset by the word ‘Resto’ in the title