![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://feddit.uk/pictrs/image/628ede8e-54d9-4c64-8a37-9a98a20bb5c0.png)
Free speech isn’t the same as freedom from consequences for that speech. Hate speech is regulated for a reason. Likening hate speech to an “opposing opinion” is outing your actual agenda here.
Free speech isn’t the same as freedom from consequences for that speech. Hate speech is regulated for a reason. Likening hate speech to an “opposing opinion” is outing your actual agenda here.
Clearly, it’s not like her literary skills allow her to reach the level of understanding irony.
Tennant, who once lowered himself to appear in a Harry Potter film, stated…
Better?
From your comment, I know that either:
You have no children who have drawn a picture for you.
You do, but they don’t know your Lemmy account.
There are dozens of us.
Upgrade infrastructure?! No, no. That money needs to go to shareholders. There’s no way millions of people need decent internet speeds more than shareholders need their 12th yacht.
you can go consume their media
Can they, though? Can they?
Tell that to Mr Potato Head or M&Ms. You might be better off phrasing it as “it shouldn’t”. Because the moment this shows up on conservative media… It will.
I don’t think discussions about the viability of magnets in space travel belongs in a political sub. Not sure what point you are making…
Tucker Carlson: “Many people are saying he isn’t an actual American. If not, who is he? Is he a Russian spy? And if so would he like to come over to my home to discuss Putin’s dreamy eyes and masculine physique? I am just asking questions here.”
You should have added “but will anyone think of the shareholders?” in there.
It’s not even AR… Didn’t they back down from that? Isn’t it mixed reality or something?
I was at a Cracker Barrel last night and among the random shit on their walls was an old checker board. The border of the board, taking the majority of the space available, was covered in ads. I guess it never changes.
I don’t think he needs a source - it is a fear. And not an entirely unreasonable one. Hell, car companies are chasing subscription payments for seat warmers in actual cars… the guy is a bastion of sanity.
London is the only city from their game history they haven’t revisited. Granted, it is the only real location they have used so likely that is a big reason they never will. But a UK-based game would be awesome.
PS is always “millions of iterations of current, next, last, the previous, the one before that and the one after that” gen. I believe they have learned.
GTA 6 is 100% already working on PC
It runs on their specific hardware under specific situations, not any PC. I am just pointing out the flaw in your en-tire logic.
I am not entirely sure that is “profit focused”. It’s profit on a real world situation, you said it yourself - less QA work which makes it able to release faster. They are only taking advantage of that fact. They would have to focus on not profit for it to happen any other way.
Thanks for the drop of sanity here. There are reasons this happens and this right here is why. Console is ready faster…that’s it. Rockstar is just making the natural business decisions given the situation. Does Rockstar also get that double dip? Yes. Do they get incentives from the various console companies vying for exclusivity? Yes. Villainize that all you want but the other option is choosing to not make money on a finished game by making it unavailable for literally no reason.
Inversely, for those complaining, demanding Rockstar to not release a finished game on any platform until it is available on the device you prefer sounds pretty stupid.
Remove the unnecessary outwardly facing “eyeball screens”. There, cheaper.