Can’t have a safe harbor and ownership.
Can’t have a safe harbor and ownership.
Do it before they drag you into an argument, lose, then ban you.
ISIS run multiple pirate bay mirrors from their caves.
please further describe thing gamma that you previously said you did not know about, but now say that you do know about.’
It’s quite amusing to ask it about conspiracy theories. There’s a huge amount in it’s training set (not because the theories are true, just that they are often written about) that it has been dissuaded from discussing.
For dual use, I’m particularly partial to the solar fence
The comparison commodity was Gas. Does something that can only be consumed once even have a lifetime?
The underground suggestion was only to counter the argument of space usage.
Using the remaining 99% of the cost to bury batteries underground would seem reasonable.
electricity still costs 0.30€/kWh average because of fossil fuel energy lobbies.
This is the price of guaranteed electricity delivered to your doorstep. We can’t get rid of gas fired power stations and kms of electricity grid network yet.
At least those items you only need to buy once.
Get rid of the 92 hereditary peers. Birth is not a qualification for government.
Which seems fine in spirit, but we don’t really want the letter of the law making something like this
O/-<
illegal
Well, the FBI did their best to cover it up, which is very suspicious.
Academic research is the standard that should be aimed for. References and no opinions.
Yes, it is possible to fact check with integrity. Not like this example.
Opinions should not enter into fact checking as opinions are not fact.
In this case the job of these people is clearly to perform damage limitation for the WEF
This is why fact checks are bullshit. Reuters admits that
a WEF social media video from 2016 that stated eight predictions about the world in 2030, including: “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy. What you want you’ll rent, and it’ll be delivered by drone.”
Now to make the statement false they bring in a strawman “Stated goal” condition and prove that particular part to be false, then claim that makes the whole thing false.
Such bullshit.
I vote John von Neumann for tech savant.
Volume x He-man colour scale.
IMHO, RFK jr is pro environment and anti big phama. He changes his policies based on fashion more than money. He is populist, not corporatist.
Both the Republican and Democrat parties are corporatist because of lobbying. Nothing to do with Trump. If we voted Hillary and Kamala then the same court outcome would occur.
Open office is 10x better than personal cubicles