I had an older phone and only a couple apps that would need it. I think it intentionally didn’t schedule anything to save power because the phone “can’t handle it” anymore.

Yup

Except the API non-neutrality.

Only Apple applications are allowed to operate in the background. Element (Matrix chat application) actually had to disable its app showing up in the share context menu because the encryption method breaks when it was used.

I don’t know what features Apple photos or files have, but other apps wouldn’t be able to do background downloads (downloading files added to a folder by another device,) on-device photo digestion (apple photos classifies what is in your photos and what text is in them in the background for privacy reasons,) and similar things.

Edit: and yes I know that there’s a background refresh toggle, but it doesn’t work. It just straight up doesn’t work. That feature is entirely up to the OS when it wants to schedule that “background refresh”. In my experience it never does.

Edit 2: Also, only Apple storage integrates directly with the photos app and files app. And that only one comes preinstalled.

Id rather kill myself (/s)

Excellent article.

QUIC? Yeah I know. Interesting system.

Good point.

Personally I belive that even absent of people like this, corporations would be assholes.

That makes me like him more.

HTTP is TCP. And I’m pretty sure Minecraft uses UDP?

Is it just that https is on port 443 and minecraft is on port 25565?

Yes

As I understand it, even though after Reboot the OS looks like its in about the same state with the wallpaper and same password to unlock, the fact that it hasn’t been unlocked yet means that certain attacks don’t work as well. I don’t know why specifically. I think it’s because the attack may still work but doesn’t reveal any sensitive data because it’s just the ROM, wallpaper, sim, etc.

There’s a stock ticker for this thing?

You can adjust the time.

Aight will do :)

What? Read my comment again carefully.

Let me explain now that I have actual focus.

For me at least, calling Cartoon CP just “Child Pornography” is kind of like calling lemonade food.

Does that make sense?

Where did I do that?

Oh good.

What indicated that I would be a pedo?

And kind reminder, child sexual abuser != pedophile. (And the other way around)

Okay, dickhead. Do you treat everyone who talks about child abuse laws as a predator?

Let me tell you EXACTLY what will happen if the federal government treats cartoon pornofraphy the same as real CSAM: the amount of CSAM being viewed goes up. Way up.

The reason why real child sexual abuse is heavily penalized and cartoon stuff isn’t is because real child sexual abuse is worse. Would you rather have people looking at cartoons or real children?

On top of that, shows like Euphoria,/and others would become just as illegal as real child pornography. After all, the characters depicted are minors, but the actors are adults. Would you be okay with someone watching Euphoria being punished the same as somene looking at real child sexual abuse?

“Oh but I would rather people not veiw anything of sexualized children, real or not-” well I hate to break it to you: its going to happen anyway. The point of criminal punishment is harm reduction. And punishing looking at a cartoon and child pornography the same is only going to increase viewership of real child pornography.

And I’m not even defending it [cartoons] but I definitely would like for real child sexual abuse to decrease, so I’m okay with (edit: CARTOONS) existing. YOU are reading into my comment.