Lols [they/them]

  • 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle


  • I mean, if someone says “Doom and Wolfenstein” without specifying “Doom Eternal” and “Wolfenstein: Youngblood” (which I had to look up, BTW), I’m thinking of Id.

    that makes sense, especially since Doom eternal is in fact still developed by id

    Wolfenstein and Doom have both reached significantly more people since they got adopted by zenimax though, so most folks who actually played the games will have probably gotten introduced to them as Bethesda published games

    “Wolfenstein: Youngblood” (which I had to look up, BTW),

    lol ok



  • Dude! The original ones were cultural touchstones in a market that wasn’t yet oversaturated. They literally invented and defined the whole genre!

    the original ones were undoubtedly MUCH more popular in their time.

    i mean sure, but that also doesnt matter to the point i was making

    More people might be playing the new ones NOW

    which is why most folks are probably not talking about the old games when they say they like wolfenstein and doom











  • no actually, since the conversation is explicitly about conspiracy to commit murder, arguing that any belief in enforcing participation in society constitutes that is explicitly saying that having laws automatically means killing people

    you dont actually get to say ‘violence’ instead of ‘murder’ in a conversation about murder, and then pretend that you arent talking about murder

    unless this is you admitting that communism is not actually a conspiracy to commit murder, in which case cool i agree!


  • being forced to participate in society is called following the laws of the country youre in

    am i correctly understanding that you believe that enforcing the law automatically necessitates killing people? thats a pretty scary thing to believe, and in no way indicative of any particular ideology im sure

    its also false, considering the continued existence of countries that have abolished the death penalty entirely

    on a side note, can you explain why you moved the goal posts from ‘communists want to kill everyone’ to ‘well maybe not all of them but the ones that dont will never succeed’ to ‘well having laws means killing people’





  • because regardless or anecdotes, a communist ideal does not by definition necessitate a conspiracy to commit murder

    even if not a single pacifist communist existed, and they do, itd still be totally possible to be both a pacifist and a communist

    in contrast, violence is a fundamental part of what makes fascism fascism. a fascist party will never be pacifistic, because it would no longer be fascist