Simple. It’s theirs when it works and yours when it doesn’t.
Simple. It’s theirs when it works and yours when it doesn’t.
At this point, why even consider getting a Roku?
Note, I rarely, if ever, use a TV anymore, so smart TVs have never appealed to me. But Roku seems to be very anti consumer (between the forced arbitration and their ad policy), so I don’t understand why someone looking to get a smart TV would actually want a Roku over an alternative.
Maybe I’m just poorly informed, but it just seems like almost anything else should be a better option?
pi = 3.1±0.05
Gotta allow for a little uncertainty, just to absolutely ruin everything.
Well there’s your problem. You need to get a cabinet.
You act as though I’m not bitter about it. You pointing out how great it was and how much it sucks that I missed it only makes me more bitter.
There is no job market where I live. As in within my friend group, we have collectively applied to ~30 jobs in the last year and gotten 2 responses. My employer was very clear that they were not giving time off for the eclipse, so that wasn’t an option. And had I just left, bye bye job. Can’t pay rent, can’t afford food.
If you want to point out how much it sucks, by all means. But don’t act like you know my situation, like I don’t know what I had to miss out on, and then point to fucking xkcd saying “see? I’m right”.
Grow some fucking perspective.
Buddy, I have bills and the options were “see totality and lose job” or “see 99% coverage and keep job”.
It was 3pm on a work day, so no that wasn’t an option.
I was 20km from the path of the totality. The next one I’ll even be able to see a partial eclipse isn’t happening until ~2045.
The book is better than the movie, and Jurassic Park is one of my favourite movies.
But if I call them that, people will think I’m talking about the Conservative Party of Canada (who also go by CPC).
Artificial General Intelligence
It did add an international arms market, where you can trade excess things for civs.
Mee too, Gale.
This was with regards to Air Canada and its LLM that hallucinated a refund policy, which the company argued they did not have to honour because it wasn’t their actual policy and the bot had invented it out of nothing.
An important side note is that one of the cited reasons that the Court ruled in favour of the customer is because the company did not disclose that the LLM wasn’t the final say in its policy, and that a customer should confirm with a representative before acting upon the information. This meaning that the the legal argument wasn’t “the LLM is responsible” but rather “the customer should be informed that the information may not be accurate”.
I point this out because I’m not so sure CVS would have a clear cut case based on the Air Canada ruling, because I’d be surprised if Google didn’t have some legalese somewhere stating that they aren’t liable for what the LLM says.