90% of the time, the manager is just reproducing what they think they’re supposed to be doing regardless of whether it helps anything.
See: the fact that 90% of the time these meetings will not have an agenda.
90% of the time, the manager is just reproducing what they think they’re supposed to be doing regardless of whether it helps anything.
See: the fact that 90% of the time these meetings will not have an agenda.
Finally someone is standing up to the woke mob. Thank you, WB conglomerate! You are the true underdog.
I hadn’t heard of radicle. I like that forgejo has CI
Applies to both.
Gonna lose to the other Tory party lol
deleted by creator
Most of them. They try to “jumpstart” their prodigy by gathering “training” data by employing remote workers that they will massively underpay. They claim that they’ll transition to pure AI over time. They… just kinda don’t, lol.
The main question I would have is why use it instead of protobuf? Having native support for binary values aside.
Imagine thinking space commies would celebrate Genocide Day.
Relatable
Captains have all the fun
The only spyware you should be concerned about is that from your own country. That’s the country that can actually do things against you with the information. What are you worried about “China” doing with your chats or metadata on which apps are open?
Bespoke: not sharing your source code because you don’t want to provide free labor to megacorps.
You can burn em with your burner of course. I haven’t burned discs in so long that I can’t remember what software I used to use, but there should still be open source, free software that can do exactly that.
If long-term, secure storage is your goal I’d go with redundant, error-correcting digital storage with off-site encrypted backups (don’t forget the password!). A proper system like that will survive a tornado (because it’s backed up off-site). A home-built RAIDZ2 NAS with one of many off-site backups will work very well. If you don’t want to figure out how to build that system, you can also just buy a NAS with a similar level of functionality (I do still recommend RAIDZ2 with at least 6 disks, though).
Blu-rays will eventually degrade, either from scratches or a slow phenomenon where they get little holes in the foil. Even if you keep making copies, you’ll run into this problem. Of course, data corruption can also occur for files on a computer, but that’s why you use a strategy that keeps ~3 copies of each file around (basically what RAIDZ2 accomplishes) so that errors can be auto-corrected.
There are other benefits to a NAS as well. You can store your own backups of your other devices there as well and have them backed up off-site. You also have the option to share your blu-ray rips over your home network, basically running your own local streaming service.
If you want to share the love, so to speak, the bandwidth of a USB hard drive is actually pretty great.
Gowron sees what you’re doing and he is not impressed
Both sever and instance have multiple meanings when it comes to deploying Lemmy though.
An instance is running Lemmy publicly, but also just running the APU creates an instance of that API. To scale, you’d probably run multiple instances of the web API.
Same applies to server, but worse. You could also call the web API a web server. You could also call a VM a server. You could also call the physical machine a VM is on a server.
When it comes to naming stuff, it’s best to find something unambiguous if it’s a core defining thing you want to tell people about. Private corps do this to build a “brand”, which is still a valuable thing for open projects so that they can gain adoption.
High Availability stans are angry about your question.
Basically… both options are ambiguous. Would be best if they used a more unique name. Like a burrow (many lemmings build burrows).
.2f%
means it will format to two decimal places max. So 5.877 will format as 5.88 and 1 will format as 1.00.
I’ve never used Temu and for all I know they’re questionable, but this article is not itself very credible. It’s heavy on uncited economic assertions, makes a hackneyed national security argument, and is actually very light on the technical security details. Plus it suggests nonsense like TikTok not requiring the android.permission.INTERNET
permission, lol.
On their “About” page they gladly announce that they’re a private company hired by big corps and finance bros so on, and they have an unexplained focus on China. I suspect they take money to do hit jobs.
I’d be interested to see a security comparison between, say, Temu, Amazon, and Facebook apps.
jQuery bby