The mere existence of the things I linked you is pretty overwhelming evidence. Feel free to refute it at your leisure.
“Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.” ― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
The mere existence of the things I linked you is pretty overwhelming evidence. Feel free to refute it at your leisure.
And I explained to you that these models aren’t incapable of learning, they’re given artificial restrictions not to in order to prevent what I linked from happening. They don’t learn to preserve the initial experience but are the exact same kind of AI. Generative.
Only 29%? The fuck does Nintendo even have on there?
About which part? The part that they can remember and expand their training data to new interactions but often become corrupted by them so much so that the original intent behind the AI is irreversibly altered? That’s been around for about a decade. How about the fact they’re “not faking it” because the added capacity to compute and generate the new content has to have sophisticated plans just to continue running in a timely manner?
I’d love to know which part you took issue with but you seemingly took my advice to shut the fuck up and I do profoundly appreciate it.
… No. They’re instanced so that when a new person interacts with them, they don’t have the memories of interacting with the person before them. A clean slate, using only the training data in the form the developers want it to. It’s still AI, it’s just not your girlfriend. The fact you don’t realize that they do and can learn after their training data proves people just hate what they don’t understand. I get it, most people don’t even know the difference between a neural network and AI because who has the time for that? But if you just sit here and go “nuh uh they’re faking it” rather than push people and yourself to learn more, I invite you, cordially, to shut the fuck up.
Dipshits giving their opinions as fact is a scourge with no cure.
Wasn’t scared about microplastics before this headline so it’s effective.
Sex scenes can absolutely feed a narrative purpose, like in Game of Thrones where it’s almost always a political motivation or has a greater meaning to it. However, if I wanted to watch two people have sex, I would go to a different site to watch it/wouldn’t go to a movie theater for it.
People aren’t upset about sex scenes, they’re upset about unnecessary ones.
Could be, and while it sounds profound on the surface, it falls apart when you realize diplomacy is a daily occurance. I can’t even comprehend how many horrible things have been completely avoided due to tactful diplomacy by people we may never know the names of.
has been bombarded with reactions (both good and bad)
Are articles just school essays with a minimum word count?
Starts as proof of concept to get you used to it. Toggle it off, hide it, but it exists. It’s there in the code. Next step is to gradually remove the option to say no. They already tried forcing people to upgrade to Windows 11. They’ll just try harder. It’s too much money for them to ignore.
And this is the straw in which I will instruct Microsoft to suck shit through.
I’m not done laughing yet, give me a minute.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Ape escape. Holy shit it’s ape escape.