Yes, we all agree its a bug. I’m specifically saying for me its quirky, and I actually like when strange things happen in rpg games. See how its become one of the playthroughs you remember most?

Same thing could happen to me and yet I’d remember it fondly as the weird playthrough where I threatened a child and was permanently hostile to any grove guards.

Game breaking means you can’t continue at all. It didnt derail your character because apparently your character is one to threaten children, and you could keep playing despite what happened.

To be fair quite a lot of men dont trust men either.

Noones saying you are wrong, you just care too much. What is a funny quirk to some is a huge game breaking issue to you.

Okay so its a big deal for you, I get it. If it happened to me I’d continue my game though, its hardly game breaking. I get that it broke your feelings but the grove has very little to do with the rest of the game. I’d have long forgotten about it by act 2, and even if I did care so much you get 25 autosaves and quicksaves.

I’m not going to hold it against Larian for leaving this in, if its in the current build. They already have gone far above any expectations, and yet here you still are complaining that Larian is ridiculous to allow this bug.

If Larian has called it a bug then I’ll agree it is. I’m saying though it wouldnt bother me if it was intentional either. Sure a bit heavy handed of a reaction to essentially bar you from camp, but each playthrough going differently than expected is a strong point.

Also, can and should are not the same as must or have to.

Dont use google AI, or at least look at the references. Its often pulling lines from unrelated documents or very old ones.

Not really broken, you don’t have to intimidate her. I’d say more like you inadvertently pissed off the only important child in camp, and now have consequences.

You actually dont have to resolve the grove quest though, you can ignore it and it will “happen” on its own, or else you can just join the goblins side temporarily.

I simply disagree but we won’t really be able to follow up with the guy anyways.

He’s looking for sympathy because he’s sad.

He’s not saying they have no right, he’s saying he’s sad they won’t come to thanksgiving. Pretty simple. You can say its justified sure, but it doesnt change his perspective any.

They likely just wouldnt post on x at all.

If they are worth saving at all. Social media is a poor replacement for real human connection.

Those companies are just taking advantage of how isolated and lonely people in general are.

Its social heroin.

We have more energy the younger we are, usually. Some people might alleviate severe health issues later in life and seem to gain energy though.

And likely you could so college again, you just did it already and know what its worth, and more importantly know what it would be worth to do it all again.

Some people leave college behind, some come back multiple times.

I was surprised how old a rumor that was too.

Check your sources.

Wouldnt they also not want to take a random name off an AI generated list? How is that something to be proud of? The thought, creativity, and history behind it is just that you put a query into chatgpt and picked one out of 500 names?

Maybe its just a difference of perspective but thats not only not a special origin story for a name, its taking from others in a way you won’t be able to properly credit them, which is essential to me.

I would rather avoid the trouble and spend the time with a coworker or friend throwing ideas back and forth and building an identity intentionally.

I suppose AI could be nice if I was alone nearly all the time.

How is that faster than just picking a random name? Noone picks software based on name.

Pft you must have read that wrong, its clearly turning them into master programmer one query at a time.

Efficiency depends on the cost doesnt it?

People dont like Bethesda. The games are alright.