Should’ve gone ethanol, then he could power it with holy spirit.

> search engine gives generative AI answer

> It cites it source, so can’t be that bad right?

> click link to source

> It’s an AI generated article

Oh no.

Pardons don’t have to be specific, they’ve been used to pardon whole groups of people before (although it’s properly called an amnesty, in that case) https://www.justsecurity.org/73851/the-constitutionality-of-non-specific-pardons/

The French company got bought out, they’re made in Poland now.

The profitable part, the actual rolling stock leasing companies, are not being nationalised though.

https://archive.ph/BMvF8

Doesn’t mean much without knowing if it’s increased domestic sales by reducing imports.

The paper also found that since Brexit the EU and UK have diverged in a number of areas … the UK has tighter rules on animal welfare.

So any deal would potentially mean lowering our animal welfare standards?

I kinda like the midnight blue shade they chose tho.

All of the Conservatives who voted, 78 of them, opposed the idea

I’m mildly surprised by that, since FPTP actively hurt them at the last election.

the US will just buy through a trading proxy at a higher cost.

That’s basically how the ban on imports of Russian oil is working…

That’s rather depressing, I didn’t know souls were so cheap.

How “decentralized” is it really if they can “crack down” like this?

I did it over 15 years ago, but for health information before the FDA nuked that. (Although you can still run the raw data through a third party program)

I’m pretty sure I already uploaded myself to at least one open source database, so I don’t see any reason to worry that much.

deleted by creator

Honestly, I don’t know enough to comment on that. I remember that during her brief stint as shadow health secretary she was known as one of the blairites given a job by Corbyn in a failed attempt to unite the party, but that’s all.

(Also, “labour right” doesn’t mean right wing in a wider context, it usually refers to Progress (Blairites), Labour First, and sometimes blue labour (although they’re kind of the opposite of progress).)

She was one of the first to join the failed coup against Corbyn in 2016.

I had to look that up, it’s the Spanish spelling? I didn’t realise. It’s commonly misspelled by native speakers.

It makes the assumption that we could do that.

There’s no certainty that another referendum would be in favour of rejoining. Most people have bigger problems than the green line not going up quite as fast or Tarquin not being able to do erasmus. If anything so little changing after brexit for the vast majority of people has just cemented the idea that we don’t need the EU. The prospect of getting drafted into WWIII is hardly going to help.

Taking us back in without another referendum is theoretically a possibility. It could provoke a backlash at the next election though, so even if they pushed it through before then we could just end up with Farage as our next PM and leaving again. The EU would hopefully realise this and not let it happen, since it would be a massive pain for everyone.

Even if you had another referendum, and it was in favour of rejoining, if it was just a slim margin again, are we going to want to rejoin, and will the EU want us rejoining, given the very likely prospect of calls for a third referendum?

Without the EU giving us some kind of deal more favourable than we had before (which is unlikely), or some kind of structural reform of the EU, it’s doubtful.

bourgeois, the spelling is bourgeois.

The truth is often crass.