I think the department that protects consumers isn’t busy with wars

Some have tactile markings for location reference, like keyboars have

At this point I’m afraid only government intervention would help (with citizens asking it to do so)

I thought for a sec it was significant

What are these guardrails? It won’t talk about specific topics?

If we can just get it to fail completely that’d be great, if that’ll make him a non billionaire

In X’s EU user base report consisting of data from February to July 2023, Musk’s social media platform had 112.2 million monthly active users in the EU. In the following six month period from August 2023 to January 2024, that number dropped to 111.4 million users.

That’s a minuscule drop % wise

Even when AI is given search results it can struggle with anything that’s not simple. Kagi has a search integration and it references the websites, even then I often find mistakes, although much less without it.

I don’t trust LLMs without this integration

Sounds like a mini social score IMO. Can companies invest into reporting tools and hire more people to monitor for cheating by reviewing reporta?

No you don’t understand, this one will say it respects your privacy

I thought chrome, yt, search, gmail/docs, android, etc. would all be separate entities, making them less willing to share data for financial reasons

I feel like this needs to be real, not a movie. Not someone who gets killed, just someone who sees their own data

You won’t, it’s a conscious trade off. Some people never put a sim or esim in their phone and have a separate dumb phone for calls, or separate hotspot

This vide explains the trade offs, reason, and approach of havjng a separate device for data: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyirQOCUUK8

And this guy shares his approach of not having a sim: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Dei2buz1X0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y83BS_mK9GE

I think generally speaking these privacy articles fail to convince the majority of people that there’s a problem, which is crucial to be able to sell the solution.

I think the abortion part is the most relatable, but you’ll hear them say they’ve got nothing to hide. I believe getting access to that data and show people what data they have on them would be the most effective. It’s like saying to someone that has nothing to hide “oh yeah? Give me your phone and your documents, let me browse what’s on them”

I hope Google gets split up, that’ll probably be the beginning of the end for targeted ads (I would hope)

How did they do it tech wise?

In terms of immersion I think they’ve done a great job. Played during a free weekend. But they need to aim for a gameplay loop, polish, and release. Not this feature creep mentality

Interesting read. There are countries with low crime rates before this technology came to light, facial recognition doesn’t seem to be the right answer for law enforcement. I wish they’d delve in more on the privacy concerns or scenarios that might outweigh the benefits

I think that today the prevention takes some effort and time to learn. In my personal experience people are mostly oblivious/shrug off the data mining, not thinking about the consequences (“what can they possibly do with this data?”).

I’d argue awareness is a big factor still