Those of us who aren’t being harassed and sent death threats by them can, sure. But that’s kind of the problem.
Those of us who aren’t being harassed and sent death threats by them can, sure. But that’s kind of the problem.
The Gamergaters really wanted the game to get bad reviews so they could use it to fuel their self-victimhood.
So, does that mean that AI photos have merit when they win photo competitions, as has happened in the past? Seems like the point he was trying to make would go both ways.
Disqualification seems appropriate. If it is against the rules to use AI photos in a normal photo category and the winner gets disqualified for that, which has happened, and it is against the rules to use a non-AI photo in this category, then the person should similarly be disqualified.
Not sure if the person behind this actually made the point they thought they were? Because it just shows that being consistent in rules and disqualification is good and the contest was consistent.
Regarding the ad for the event in the replies there, apparently the term “Anglo-Jews” means English speaking. But it’s also still a very blatant euphemism for “white European English speaking Jews” because that group makes up almost the entirety of whom the word would be used for.
So, yeah, it is still based on racist undertones regardless.