For anyone wondering what the “critique” was:
For anyone wondering what the “critique” was:
It’s also bullshit as it has no bearing on the actual properties of the chips. Manufacturers use these as product names. Here’s an article discussing it.
https://www.pcgamesn.com/amd/tsmc-7nm-5nm-and-3nm-are-just-numbers
Bernie is center-left at most. If he’s too left, you don’t lean left at all. If he’s not left enough, that makes sense.
Oh do go get fucked.
Ackshualllly, it’s ephebophilia because these are young women above the age of…
/s
Just kidding, it’s CP
Username does NOT check out, great write up. Easily a perfect 5/7.
Removed by mod
Considering many buildings don’t have air conditioning, you’re spot on.
Consider yourself lucky. Many older European homes don’t have bathroom fans. Some older bathrooms barely have windows.
The irony of you actually being a passive aggressive douchebag by pretending the op might be passive aggressive is off the charts.
I fell off the Bethesda train around Oblivion. They peaked with Morrowind and it has been downhill since.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
In a healthy society people have the critical thinking skills you lack.
Assuming they’re referring to the Christian God, a selfish, emotionally unstable mega toddler, their behavior would be appropriate.
I see you learned your discussion skills from the Donald Trump School of Bullshiting.
You’d have to ask op, we can only guess at anything beyond what they wrote. That’s my entire point.
They did not state or imply that Boeing was the only company to fix a hardware issue via a software update, nor did they state or imply that doing so is an inherently dangerous or bad idea.
The verifiable context was simply that Boeing, a disreputable company, also attempted to correct a hardware issue with a software update. One might infer that the OP could be suggesting this instance may be bad given Boeing’s failure at doing so combined with Tesla’s dubious reputation due to its association Elon Musk, a demonstrably unethical person, and its record of vehicular build quality issues. Claiming the comment suggests ALL efforts to do so are INHERENTLY bad or dangerous cannot be supported without additional information from the OP, though, so criticisms to that effect rely on pure speculation.
Sometimes people just want to share recipes without someone coming in to debate or criticize on the merits of their lifestyle, the validity of the recipe, issues they see in a movement, or really anything else.
While the Internet has been great for connecting people, it also connects you to people who don’t understand or particularly care about “time and place”. They seem to think their opinion is so worthwhile that they must share it, sometimes aggressively, with everyone, anywhere, even with those who actively do not want to hear it. When they are told no one wants to hear it, they often engage in lengthy mental gymnastics to justify why they’re being censored instead of even considering taking any personal responsibility. God forbid one self reflect. This is you, by the way.
There are venues to criticize what you find problematic about contemporary veganism. This isn’t one. We just want to share information without non-vegans flocking in to share their precious opinions. There are many other communities here you can use to share your opinion that are meant for such a purpose. Pick one and go there instead of fighting with the people who don’t want to hear yours.