

81·
15 days agoThat’s not the question.
It wasn’t about whether the LLM was well reasoned, it was about whether the conclusion was (pragmatically speaking) correct.
That’s not the question.
It wasn’t about whether the LLM was well reasoned, it was about whether the conclusion was (pragmatically speaking) correct.
I have the channels I’m subscribed to and the content on Nebula. I’ve installed a browser extension to remove the sidebar. Some of the channels I’m subscribed to may also recommend videos themselves.
I have solved this problem on a personal level.
What you just said makes no sense. Mozilla is already involved in Firefox and Firefox is far from a monopoly.
But everyone should … if Firefox had their act together.
Again, that wasn’t the original question.
The question was about whether women are genuinely more likely to be passed over for a job offer if they ask for as much pay as a man would ask for, or if (as you described), or both. A broken clock is right twice a day, and it’s missing the point of the question if you go and explain why you can’t rely on said broken clock.
Are hiring managers actually less likely to hire women if they ask for market-rate pay, as opposed to men when they do the same?