7·
4 days agoWe lack a translate button. Rednote and weibo have translate buttons. We need that.
Belgian 29 year old male, accountant, into physical fitness, outings and watching TV series/films. Enjoy pestering you about your political views and interested in economics.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
Joined 23 days ago
Cake day: March 10th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
There’s no central authority here. But if it doesn’t matter which instance you are on, then all the users on Lemmy are still just part of Lemmy.
On the graph I see other icons than Lemmy.
Are we able to see content from other social media? Or what is meant with that
That actually makes me like her. Being critical of your own views.
Nothing more that I despise than people who choose a side of an argument just because it’s “their side”. Have a back bone. It’s okay to switch sides on certain subjects. Being an extremist is being a moron.
I can imagine that spamming/constant harassment/advertising/etc can ruin a space. Especially when it can be automated.
Perhaps it would be better with temp bans and that moderation is automated in order to prevent bias.
It’s been 1 week since I found out about Lemmy, liking it quite a bit.
I wonder, is there an area on this social media that are extremist pro free speech?
Such as, okay you’re being a total shithead, I still won’t ban you.
I’m just curious if spaces such as that even exist, and if they do, what they lead to.
Met my wife on a little internet forum called 9chat. Right before it disappeared.
These little spaces on the internet were quite nice to be. Always seeing the same people. It has a different feeling.
Decentralising social media will have its positives. When one tries to control public opinion, people can flee to another one for example.
17·13 days agoIf the major stakeholder and CEO is actively being an unelected politician addressing policy changes onto the public, then repercussions need to happen.
It would not be wise to show people that they can achieve plutocracy. Plutocrats only lose their power by losing their wealth, so if that’s what has to happen, then that is the plan.
3·17 days agoTook 2,7 seconds on le chat
The 20% is there because we had the financial crisis due to people buying houses that they couldn’t afford.
Using the bank in order to get money for a purchase is a good idea, as long as you invest the money.
Even if you can buy the house outright, it’s better to borrow money with the house as collateral and invest the rest in market weighted ETFs.