That’s not what neglect is

A: all models are trained on something

2, you’re building your own straw man here. You’ve set up an extremely narrow condition under which this particular type of pedophilia is acceptable. Prove to me that that’s the norm, that it’s a typical use scenario, and that people looking at that crap are exclusively looking at loli, and not images meant to look like real people, and there’s a debate to be had there. But if you think any of that is true you’re lying to yourself. Sexualization of others is not going to happen in a vacuum under sterile conditions, it’s going to bleed in to real life.

The act of baking does indeed make you a baker. Definitionally.

Just because you aren’t going pro doesn’t mean you aren’t making a cake.

The only people that sexualize children are pedophiles.

I used to use the company Wi-Fi to look for other jobs every time they threatened a change I didn’t like.

Where my FF8 homies at tho

This is great and advisable.

But what about online only games that can be nuked whenever the publisher feels like it?

https://www.stopkillinggames.com/

I dunno, when Neelix made the soup spicy Tuvok thought it was too spicy.

On the inverse I’ve found it to be quite bad at that. I can generally count on the AI answer to be wrong, fundamentally.

Might depend on your industry. It’s garbage at g code.

My money is still on Paul Le Roux.

It’s a cheap LED pen light, they hand them out like candy where I work. Most of us have our own flashlights anymore.

Steve Perlman

Can you dumb it down a little doc?

At least eventually Martok looks after him.

Martok fuckin loves glory. We’ve all seen him seeking it.

Well at least Data pretends to love his kid.

Poor Alexander never had a chance

“MORE!”
believe it or not also Kylo Ren

But he’s EEEEEVILLLL

The pencil does not make the art.

There’s a fundamental difference between AI image generation and an artist creating something that is both inherent and obvious.

If you can’t see that then I’m not sure there’s much help for you.

More than that, art being created by an artist has a style and a feeling behind it. There’s a nostalgia present in every painting. An artist saw something, and recreated it in a way that spoke to them.

An algorithm can recreate images that look similar but with no understanding. It’s just an image and lacks all the things that makes art what it is. By removing humanity from art you literally remove the reason for it to exist.

Flatly, it isn’t art. It’s slightly better than random. But as it happens, humans are better at that too.

He didn’t make shit.

A computer made it. He provided some guidance.

So we’ve been down that road. There are company computers available for that purpose, and training has been provided. It’s a joke we tell each other around here that the only training we get is on the app.

For the handful of folks who are legally prohibited from having a smart phone, the state has requirements in place that they be notified of any schedule changes in advance, they’re often the first to know.

The CEO frequently holds little meetings and fields questions, that’s the next route.

I don’t know what they were sold or why they’re so insistent that we download the app, but their feverish insistence that we download it sure makes me suspicious.