• 2 Posts
  • 44 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle













  • This is the risk and it has happened before.

    The AI won’t do my job exactly, but managers mostly manage, i.e. deal with organisational overhead. That Excel you’ve been maintaining for the past decade was never as crucial to the business’ success as you made it appear. It was something the higher ups liked to talk about with pretty charts. An UI can generate other things to talk about from the same data.

    I don’t agree that those people don’t have transferable skills, but I agree that’s going to hurt. Like flattening hierachies, self-organised teams and outsourcing, previously cushy jobs will be replaced with more stressful ones.

    You used to have a secretary to make calls for you and organise your calender. Now you have copilot and customers call you directly.

    You don’t need powerful AI or anything for this to happen. They just stopped hiring secretarial staff when managers learned how to use a computer.


  • Most specialized software are web apps running in a browser hosted on the cloud these days. I’m sure they exist, but I couldn’t name any HR, ERM, CRM, … software that’s not a web app.

    The desktop OS is becoming irrelevant. That’s why those who want a Mac or Linux notebook can make it work, at least from a purely technical point of view; i.e. if the company allows it. That’s also, why there will never be a year of the Linux desktop. (I mention Macs here, because while OS X gets some commercial software that you won’t get on Linux, it’s not that much outside of some niches)

    There will never be a year of the Linux desktop because you gain very little from replacing Edge on Windows with Firefox on Linux (a different software that does the same thing). However, you loose some specialised software and your IT supplier, your IT service provider, half of your IT staff and some of your non-IT employees’ skills. This does not sound like a good business case.

    Linux on the desktop never happened, because Linux on the server replaced desktop applications.


  • I don’t know if it is fair to call it a disaster. I don’t know enough from the inside, but I believe in retrospect the goal was maybe to ambitious or plain wrong.

    They were attempting to port huge amounts of decades old Office macros to OpenOffice. That failed, but before the LiMux project they had already failed to migrate the same to a modern version of MS Office.

    The goal for LiMux was to be a better Windows than the best Windows Microsoft would offer at the time. Literally impossible.

    That combined with strong lobbying and users confused with a different UI and probably a lot of small day-to-day issues (which happens with any software, but can make an IT department look bad) made it politically hard to sustain an ‘experiment’.

    The current IT lead of Munich, hired after migrating back to Microsoft, does not seem to be a Microsoft fan.