Finally, we can all come together
in our hatred for Star Wars
Finally, we can all come together
in our hatred for Star Wars
Is love to sit by Sisko, he’s hands down my favorite. But I’m not sure I could take Shatner’s Kirk trying to unconsentually kiss me the whole flight.
And Neelix is Gilligan
Death Star might win the battle, but the Borg win the war
1: read the post 2: that’s still a ridiculous price
I’ve worked on supposed “Agile” teams that operate this way, and worked on an Agile team that actually work ridiculously well. The biggest issue with Agile isn’t the philosophy, it’s when management starts using it to cut costs. This comment is what it turns into. Notice that every single one of these points lower cost. But one of the main assumptions of Agile is that the workers control the work, managers support the workers. The places I’ve been where Agile didn’t work it was because management was unwilling to buy into this basic assumption, then use Agile as a crutch for not giving the team what they needed to be successful.
The one successful team I was on that was Agile, the entire group of around 12 worked directly with the customer, and our manager’s role was to ask “what do you need”. It was hands down the best dev role I was ever in (before I became a teacher).
Apple Music. Their algorithm isn’t the best, but they have everything I want and they pay artists better than Spotify.
I’m not disagreeing with you about it being incorrectly advertised. I’m saying the headline is written to imply that the bible specifically excludes only the amendments that apply to slavery and women. That is not the case. In fact, the only place in the article that mentions that exact fact is the headline. So while it is technically true to say that it excludes those amendments, it is, at best, misleading. Why not say it “excludes amendment to handle the death of a president”? That is also technically true.
So what I’m saying is: you’re engaging in Lemmy’s second past time, bashing someone for calling out something that’s misleading because the implication fits your narrative.
It can both be reporting the facts and be rage bait. A headline that said “Trump Bible only contains the Bill of Rights and not the rest of the Constitution” would also be factual, but it doesn’t push the narrative that Trump is anti-black and anti-woman.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Trump is absolutely anti-black and anti-woman, but the headline is absolutely ragebait. It is selective to get people to click it.
That’s not true. Fox News gets through just fine.
Israel: “those children were Hamas”
The fact that the George Floyd protests happened during this time of WFH and actually took hold for a while completely support this claim.
Yea, but does the AI ask me why “x” doesn’t work as a multiplication operator 14 times while complaining about how this would be easier in Rust?
I used to play a ton of Escape Velocity back in the day. I still consider Nova to be one of the greatest games I’ve ever played. Naev is ok, pretty good even, but it’s not quite up to what Ambrosia did with EV.
A 2 year old video ripping on Apple for something that literally every single platform does, but significantly more in-depth than simple certificate checking (which is all Apple is doing).
I believe in Reddit terms, we called this “karma-whoring”
I live in the States in a state that banned gender affirming care for minors.
One exchange I’ll never forget is a state senator saying “we have to ban these because we don’t know what the long term side effects might be”, to which the only queer senator we have responded “but we are well aware of the long term side effects of suicide”