Manure will always be waste though. We actually have a pretty big unseen crisis, that makes us dependend on animals if we want to fertilize organically.

Our sewage is too filled with heavy metals, drugs, hormones and antibiotics, as that we could use it to fertilize fields. In germany this is prohibited by law.

So we need Animals, which is a pretty insane idea as the food that humans eat and shit out will always be lost in the process, a leaking circuit.

Small scale recycling is a possible solution.

All Cannabis is vegan tho. They may use Chicken manure for fertilisation.

Not using Windows helps a ton :)

I recently got a zipbomb + trojan through a Github comment. Was removed very quickly and unrecoverably, crazy that they can even so this, not even the repo owners see it anymore.

Wtf did I just watch

Mind to elaborate?

My backup is seeding.

Did you read my comment? (The one above)

If you participate, you encourage.

I would say exploit is getting a benefit from someone without giving anything back.

This is a corpse, it doesnt feel, you cant give it anything. As far as we know.

You can bury it but this is really just a concern of the relatives etc.

It’s also just living people that care about what happens with their body. My guess: this is a egoistic response, which is understandable, but makes no sense when you are dead.

Simply because we cannot imagine how it is to be dead.

That would be a point against opt-in.

I am not sure about exact definitions.

But afaik vegans dont finance or encourage animal “use”. Like buying, buying for a lower price, eating in front of other people thus normalizing it etc.

This doesnt apply at all in this case. There are no people (well, anymore) killing others to get medicinal corpses. So you dont normalize anything and you also dont fuel any market.

I mean, we have laws for that. On a free market this could increase the demand and people could start killing people to sell them.

If using a dead body for these purposes is exploitation or not is a philisophical or even religious/spiritual/belief question.

As far as we know, if an animal dies, the corpse doesnt feel, experience or live anymore.

As these animals (people) didnt die because of this, it is not exploitation, I would say.

To be honest, yes this should be forbidden, but active consent is often rare.

And to be fair, these people are already dead. So I would say it is vegan, as this is not their purpose, they were not bred, not held and are also not eaten but used for education, research and helping living humans.

Idk I dont find this that crazy? Even though family members should of course be able to claim the bodies, and yeah it is kinda sick to scratch corpses of poor people off the street and look at them only when they are dead.

That context makes it more fucked up.

I dont care about alternatives. It just needed to click in my head.

But yeah, tofu with good seasoning rocks.

So the US nutella is even worse??

Damn

As a German… Nutella is crap. There are way better brands.

Absolutely more than that

Well it doesnt work for a lot of use cases. Like opening a post link on whatever instance, in an app like jerboa.

This simply doesnt work, so the UX is really barely usable.

But I use it anyways XD

Yes, I also dont understand why Peertube works so badly. It is one of the platforms with the most quality content, but its decentralization really makes it require an app.

sepiasearch.org helps here, to connect all instances and index them

Oh cool didnt know that