Seems this time we’ll likely evade the resident weevil
Seems this time we’ll likely evade the resident weevil
I overhead management talking about redundancies.
Boss said to your colleague “I’ve got to lay you or Jack off”
Where can you see lions… Only in Kenya!
I decided not to buy it yet.
Well, if he’s going to walk about all the time without trousers, what does he expect?
Husband got me one last valentine’s day. I have to be a little careful about where I wear it.
That’s the really stupid part of all this.
Small amount of money massive personal and political consequences. Hilariously stupid.
Multiphasic structural integrity fields
Relationships
🥰
Absolutely!
I run training sessions twice per week, we start and end each session like this. Once you learn to trust the group, its a pleasant experience!
Detail counts!
Its a simple law. If your party has received evidence that your clai is false. You must stop using it or face legal punishment.
Let us reflect on how parties might react to this and how a simple law might not achieve your aims.
Another wrinkle is deciding who is going to police this, who is the arbiter of truths and lies?
In almost every case I can think of, political parties already avoid lying.
With statistics they can find the right one to backup their point and ignore the other study which contradicts them. They offer opinions, points of view, oversimplificatios and predictions.
None of these are lies. Manipulation of the same family certainly. It was true that we sent £350 million per week to the EU, except it really wasn’t and yet if you offered evidence that it was a lie it’d be easy to produce evidence that it wasn’t. Truth is complex.
Add to this we have a mechanism built into democracy that is intended to punish parties who lie or otherwise behave this way, its the voters. For this to work we need an informed and aware population to vote in elections, your post suggests you don’t see the voters as capable of this?
To achieve an informed electorate who understands complexity and nuance getting out of the simple mindset of right and wrong is needed, away from simple truths and lies.
In short… “Examine a law not for the good it will do if correctly applied but for the harm it will cause if incorrectly applied”
Reform most likely, possibly for the Tories.
It’s going to be funny either way I’m sure.
I wonder if tasker could do it… 🤔
See, he says “one rule” but that sounded like three
And there it is.
They were waiting for this one with much anticipation.
It’s a small group of voters who this represents, but they’re important voters, they’re swing voters.
Did I say all those things?
Make the case?
I’m not campaigning.
Its art, make of it whatever you wish!