Don’t think there’s any new info in the video.

a database of banned shapes

banned shapes

banned

shapes

Maybe the dumbest possible idea here from government regulators. You think you’re going to somehow legislate certain geometry out of existence? “Sorry, you can’t print that ILLEGAL SHAPE with the printer you own!” Same vacant headed assholes that think they can ban encryption. Fuck off, shrivel up and perish, please.

I remember instances where the force required to disconnect the connector caused me to slip and rip a wire out.

For those who don’t care to read the full article

Or even the whole title, really

Extend, Embrace, Extinguish?

His entire channel is gold

Fun fact: It doesn’t even meet Apple’s own standard for text contrast!

Dude… Who here is asking for “a magical piece of PCB for free?” I’m assuming that means you think people are asking for free phones?

See the last sentence of my original comment.

It’s about the social phenomenon around the imessage chat colors, which is intentional on Apple’s part. You must have a social in-group and an out-group. To be in the in-group, you must purchase the correct products, subscribe to the correct services.

CONSUME

Apple doesn’t “share a lot of the blame.” The blame belongs solely to Apple and their insistence on a closed ecosystem. They intentionally hamstring any cross functionality with competing devices, even features as simple as text messaging. It’s important for Apple to foster a cult-like mentality among their consumers.

Supposedly, if you put a slice of bologna on a regular, painted car panel overnight, it will peel the paint off with it. I don’t know if that’s true or not. The cyber truck doesn’t have paint so it’s irrelevant, but that’s the one automotive bologna anecdote that I know of.

So write a law against certain advanced mathematics. And prosecute anyone who uses advanced math. Best of luck with that. AI is math. You’re demonstrating that you don’t understand what the technology actually is or does by comparing algorithms to objectively immoral actions.

In real life, the cat does not go back into the bag. You can legislate behavior to shape society, to an extent. You can’t legislate what kinds of math people are allowed to do, it’s just not going to work.

You’re not operating within the realm of reality, which is why people don’t take you seriously.

I know, I know, go fuck myself, I’m an anti-human, not worthy of life, etc. I get it, you can spare me the reply.

Enjoy yourself bud.

You seem to know so much about me, simply from the observation that you can’t “ban” an entire concept like that in the real world. Amazing!

I see you’ve got some big feelings about this. Maybe try to express them without the hateful abusive language. Hope your day gets better!

Trying to ban AI is like trying to ban math. Or staple Jello to a tree. It just doesn’t work that way.

deleted by creator

They won’t be including encryption so it’s not quite feature parity but yeah

Ofc, Apple being Apple, I wouldn’t put it past them to artificially “break” things or arbitrarily introduce limits between RCS and iMessage

That’s where my money is

LOL I always knew that creepy Life360 shit would come back to bite people in the ass eventually.