

Well. That’s not changed by anything in your article …
It’s interesting and all, but it’s more about how the people they were investigating under pseudonyms were eventually installed over the efforts to get investigate themselves…
Like, that’s fucking huge. And definitely implies they were really involved in it, but it’s not a smoking gun
Edit:
To be clear the most likely explanation has always been the same as Cheney and 9/11…
They knew it was coming, in general if not specific, and they choose to let it happen because that was what was best for their interests.
That’s a billion times more likely than the CIA taking explicit actions to lead to the assassinations of a US president. It takes a lot to make something like this happen, very little to know it’s gonna happen and intentionally let it happen.
The sticking point would be actively trying to remember something would look like lying.
Like, ask someone their name and they’ll answer immediately just yanking straight from memory.
Ask them where they were on Dec 2nd 2017, and them trying to remember is going to look like them trying to come up with a story.
The issue is when we don’t know an answer, it’s normal to just make shit up but be confident it’s the truth.
We learned a lot about that from split brain patients, but since we’re not cutting brains in half anymore, we can’t really study it. Just review the old case folders from the brief window it was a thing and those patients didn’t understand what was happening