

Oh no another fraud conviction fine that equals a rounding error for the company.


Oh no another fraud conviction fine that equals a rounding error for the company.


Loooooseeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrs! Demanding fiscal accountability. HA!
The very idea!


You know this already but your company management are morons.


‘At some point you’ve got to make money’
Hey hey hey, now, that’s loser talk. Here, c’mon, let’s snort a ton of coke.


For those that didn’t see the article from yesterday, the relevant rule that they refused to waive was the one that said a company must be profitable.
lol


Au contraire!


The Securities and Exchange Commission filing comes after GoPro has already shared that it is considering a potential sale, news that followed a a $93.5 million net loss for 2025 and $432.3 million in 2024.
Psst. Your management is atrocious.


Maybe that guy in the black leather jacket can pay for everybody’s credits. Y’know, extend and embrace the grift.


Nothing new under the sun.


That’s why I rely on Lemmy for my information about . . . um . . about . . .
Well. Owls. I guess.
And dull things.
💪


Don’t stick your thing in it!!
Remember Wally? Ooof. I mean, kind of a jerk and all but. What a way to go.


Can I sue for every goddamned billboard out there? Plz?


And why not? The platform has been running flawlessly for years now. Those ‘hu-mans’ are basically cruft now.


Came to comment the same.
Getting in touch with Creative was a frustrating process.
They do not have any security contacts. In fact, I wasn’t even able to find regular contacts that wasn’t just a support form on their website. I tried (two times) to get in contact with them via the web form before giving up and contacting SingCERT to act as an intermediary, hoping they would have better luck reaching Creative.
Initially, SingCERT didn’t seem to be able to get in contact with Creative either. It took Creative nearly two months to respond to SingCERT. Unfortunately, their response was that “they do not consider this to be a vulnerability, as it does not present a cybersecurity risk”. I don’t know how they reached this conclusion, but it became clear that Creative had no interest in responding to or addressing this issue.
That and it has a microphone built in.


As you might expect, the discourse has a sprinkling of conspiracism. According to the Telegraph, there is a common belief among Restore supporters that Farage is “paid opposition”. For his part, Lowe took to one of the dozens of identical, anything-goes YouTube channels to say “there is a danger that Reform is managed opposition. I think the Establishment sort of knows that the reds and the blues may not win, so they need a safety valve.”
Or is it Restore Britain which is actually part of a secret Establishment agenda? TalkTV presenter Alex Philips speculated: “I know some Restore fanatics are fooled into thinking Reform is ‘controlled opposition’. I suspect the opposite is true,” pointing to links Lowe has with the Tories which even she admitted might be “circumstantial” as evidence. Look guys, we’ve all had our fun with the controlled opposition thing.
Why does that sound so familiar


Hey, I’ve committed lots.
You wouldn’t know the project. It lives in Canada.
🔥