![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/24b1e15c-f5b6-4a90-9369-d6cf1a7f1cac.png)
She was also in yellowjackets.
She was also in yellowjackets.
I used it for my job when I’m troubleshooting Windows or some software. The AI websites generally just have the same script over and over where I when I was able to find the forum/blog post it was more helpful.
I don’t think you are accounting for ease of use. It took time and skill for an individual to photoshop someone else. This is just an app. It takes more effort to prove the truth, then it does to create a lie. Not to mention, how in the other article it explains that people are using this to bait children. :/
I think they were just making a public statement that they didn’t support this, that’s it.
Is there a case law that you know about that supports this? I ask, sincerely, because every one that I know of that deals with dmca was a copyright case. Wiretap act or section 5 of the FTC act, sure, but dmca?
Those are Canada’s fucking gooses!