![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/8167d883-d9f5-4066-8ae7-80e8b3506722.webp)
Please do not swear at me
Please do not swear at me
They would choose not to because it would save them money and that’s all they care about.
Remember, they used to kick you off their plans when you got cancer claiming it was a preexisting condition.
Every gay person on their spouses healthcare plan who will be thrown off it gives a fuck.
Yep, now they will run those lies on every social media timeline and they’ll look believable to low information voters
Gay marriage is toast
It wasn’t a debate. It was 2 hours of clip harvesting in which the right got everything they could possibly want while the left got squat diddly
Then I will file a criminal complaint against you with the police.
Reported, enjoy your ban for harrassment
Please don’t swear at me
Oh, I always thought he said fired and everyone just went along with it
That’s what they always used to say to Chris Hansen when he’d confront them about the texts
Yeah but you can’t legally play Mario on it
I obviously have issues with his actions in '16
But they were going after him for releasing the footage of the US gunning down civilians. Not his actions during the election.
The c-levels are really sick of all these new features they’re adding and no one is using them because of silly reasons like “they don’t work good” or “I can’t even see the point of this for me”.
In their wisdom, they’ve taken the option to say no away from the users. Now they have a much easier time justifying their bonus this year, just look at how many users are using their new features!
Yes, if I don’t have the absolute best quality I can get it drives me crazy.
Julian’s poor butt hole
I never used to understand why Picard and the crew got upset with Data’s long winded explanations until I got a Google Home. Now I understand very well.
Those are periods!
I don’t think the Nordics have to worry about a successful invasion from Russia, but an unsuccessful one would also suck really bad
A low information voter, also known as a misinformation voter, is someone who participates in elections despite being generally poorly informed about political issues[1]. This term has been popular in the United States since the mid-1990s.
Key characteristics of low information voters include:
Low information voters often lack fundamental facts about government and exhibit a low “need for cognition,” meaning they are less inclined to engage in effortful thinking about complex issues[4]. This can make them more vulnerable to misinformation and less likely to critically evaluate candidates’ claims or policy positions[4].
It’s important to note that the term “low information voter” is sometimes used pejoratively, particularly in American political discourse[1]. However, the concept is studied seriously in political science to understand voting behavior and its impact on electoral outcomes.
Citations: [1] Low information voter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_information_voter [2] What Are Low Information Voters? - ThoughtCo https://www.thoughtco.com/low-information-voters-5184982 [3] Trump Is Preying on Low-Information Voters - New York Magazine https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-low-information-voters.html [4] ‘Low information voters’ are a crucial part of Trump’s support https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/11/07/low-information-voters-are-a-crucial-part-of-trumps-support/ [5] The Tragedy Of Rush Limbaugh’s Low Information Voter Theory https://www.forbes.com/sites/cedricmuhammad/2013/08/27/the-tragedy-of-rush-limbaughs-low-information-voter-theory/