• 0 Posts
  • 378 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle





  • marcos@lemmy.worldto3DPrinting@lemmy.worldDust.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Yeah, dust is not what you need to care about. But it’s not good to have a printer indoors.

    There are enclosed printers that you can plug ventilation ducts that solve this problem. Some have filters, but any filter without a molecular sieve (usually activated coal) won’t help you, because the problem isn’t with dust.

    Resin printers also give you problems on handling the resin. It’s not enough to enclose those printers, you need protection equipment and a place to deal with the supplies and recent prints.








  • It’s not like DISCO flaunted around saying “we don’t hate gay people in this ship.”

    Well, after DS 9 it would just be repetitive. Also TNG spent a few episodes on this exact point, but it wasn’t a main topic.

    But people tend to focus their complains about things being “preachy” when those things put the preach above the story-telling. DISCO absolutely had this flaw in some point or another. Never for very long, though, so it really wasn’t a main characteristic. Anyway, when a show is simply good, almost nobody gets bothered by the preaching.



  • marcos@lemmy.worldtogrimdank@lemmy.world"Xenocide"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    30 days ago

    It means “killing a group of inter-related X”, where people naturally fills the X with “people”.

    Killing a group of animals isn’t referred to as genocide.

    Not usually. But it’s perfectly within the meaning of the term, and people could easily apply it to whales and primates if somebody decided to practice it.

    More practically, it doesn’t apply to killing un-related people at random. It’s specifically applies to targeting people related through some characteristic.


  • A has been consistently improving it since before the change, so it’s only possible that they are managing to the metric if they had earlier access to it.

    B may be doing that, but the graph doesn’t actually measure how many bugs you closed. Those ones seem to have decided to manage by the metric, removing the variance but targeting a high, comfortable level.

    Agreed on C, they did a large “hey, we will be measured by that now” one time effort and then forgot about the metric.

    The change didn’t improve anybody’s performance.