People tend to like what they are used to.
People tend to like what they are used to.
Anatsa uses advanced techniques to avoid >detection and gain access to banking >information.
Anyone who knows what those advanced techniques are?
There is probably licensed code in there somewhere. Which means open sourcing it is really cumbersome. It would probably cost more money to open source it than to do the refund.
It’s so weird that Google migrated to the pile of dung that is RCS instead of just fostering any of their existing chat protocols. Google Talk was working great 15 years ago…
Odd choice to use Android 11 on one of them and Android 14 on the other. Makes me suspicious of their ability to keep these devices up to date over time.
This is enough for most projects.
You cannot seed files that are altered. It’s not the same files anymore.
So yes, as long as you want to continue sending, you need to keep the original files around.
That’s my point exactly. Everyone is so old that a 70 year old is considered young relative to the others.
the 70-year-old Kennedy has portrayed his athleticism and relative youth as an advantage over the two oldest people to ever seek the White House
A 70 year old is the young guy? That’s nuts
Hopefully they have a usable amount of RAM.
The initial use case of Facebook was great. It let me keep in touch with old friends. But as soon as they diverged from just showing my friends posts in chronological order, I removed my account.
Never thought of that. Scary though.
Unless you live and travel within the EU. Then you can use your phone as much as you want and know that you won’t get a higher bill than usual.
Exactly, it’s just an estimate.
I couldn’t agree more. I hate that some open source projects are using discord for communicating.
The package name is the unique id. If you want to distribute multiple variants (like two versions with differing signatures) they should not have the same identifier. If they are not the same the id/package name should not be the same.
Having different package names would also prevent the Google play store from trying to update it.
It’s a problem of trust. Differing signature is an indication of third party tampering. People shouldn’t start to see difference in signatures as an ordinary occurrence. It should be an high alert event.
Mismatched signatures have been discouraged since day one of Android. A mismatched signature is a sign that some one other than the original publisher built this package, and the user needs to be aware that it might be malicious.
That F-Droid went with this setup with mismatched signatures was always going to make their apks look suspicious.
I hate that my government (Sweden) is a driving force behind this.