what have they replaced the X button on their controllers with, then?

pshhhh. just transport the pollution elsewhere. problem solved.

why is squirrel spelled like a professor from Hogwarts?

when it looks at a crossword, it thinks it can solve it. but it can’t.

(courtesy: the taskmaster’s assistant)

did the site allow ranking of politicians or billionaires?

the whole point of I, Robot was to show the flaws in the three laws and how they aren’t watertight.

take the story of the robot who declared hinself a prophet on the Mars station and locked up the humans. or the one about mind-reading robot that started lying because of Rule 1. both highlight how that particular permutation of rules doesn’t always do what it says on the wrapper.

im talking of the book of short stories, of course. not the travesty of a movie starring will smith.

looks like the engineers misunderstood what “training mode” was supposed to do.

they would want to improve their track record after this, otherwise the public would just choo them up.

the scenes when one won’t be able to choose 5318008.

cheers mate.

what are these rules? i genuinely am not aware of them.

see star trek TNG episode The Arsenal of Freedom for a more explicit visualisation of this ☝️ guy’s point.

“open the fridge door, HAL”

“i’m sorry, Dave. i’m afraid i can’t do that.”

there are a few time trackers on f-droid that seem to fit thia requirement.

“a time tracker” is one.

he kept trying to climb up not realising that he was getting deeper and deeper.

quite ironically in this context, san jose is named after st. joseph – he of the legal dad of jesus fame – who was once famously told there was no room at the inn and had to make do in a stable.

just an inquiry out of curiosity: why are more people not using Gimp? does PS really offer so much more?

(this is more an aside to the conversation in the OP, and as such is not meant to derail the query asked within. nor is it an attempt to pass judgement on anyone.)

which is the smallest smartphone manufacturer?

(by which i mean the manufacturer of the smallest reliable smartphone.)

they will pass go. they will collect £200.

Reuters had a choice to reword the article (like some other media houses in OP’s link have done) or retract the article. they have chosen to do the latter.

the core difference is that choice. had the court deemed that the article should have been taken down, Reuters wouldn’t have even had that choice.

getting mad at the court in this case is akin to getting mad at the car that a drunk driver drove into a house. sure, it has been the proximal instrument of destruction, but it wasn’t the one who veered off the road.

blame the leeching lawyers here.

just a minor clarification. the court did not order the article to he taken down. the court just said that the article constitutes defamation.

it was Reuter’s decision to therefore take down the article. in OP’s first link, there’s info of other media houses that have also pulled such stories.

blame the scummy lawyers protecting the scumbag and his predatory behaviour.