wasn’t that an aircraft engine irl?
wasn’t that an aircraft engine irl?
When your first notification about the change is a Mastodon post telling you to look for a pre-checked checkbox that wasn’t there before…
I typed the URL that was literally printed in the packaging of a [new] Logitech mouse, and the page didn’t exist! Like, how?!‽
Was the word not used in Blackadder the Third, “Ink and Incapability”, September 1987 when Samuel Johnson has just finished his dictionary, and Blackadder trolls him by making up a load of words?
(it’s not quite the same; one of their connectors is a shrouded socket)
Well it’s not an HTTP status code; it’s an HTCPCP status code.
That’s … even worse than the headline! Not only did the budget not include the £4000m yearly cost, it actually said that it expected -£230m (making money not spending money)
Wikipedia can also be useful to find software - e.g.:
or look at the Wikipedia page for whatever you want to replace and see if it’s in a category such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Audio_editing_software_for_Linux
You can even do this with things that aren’t software, e.g. Homebase -> UK home improvement stores -> Screwfix.
That’s not an EV issue that’s a modern car issue.
One of the worst privacy risks was Buick who didn’t even make EVs.
Someone’s university has CH-751 locks on their toilet roll dispensers, and is missing a roll…
Would banning the voting half of the pseudonymous account not mitigate the immediate issue? Then asking their instance admin to later lookup and ban the associated commentating account.
So you’re saying good advertisements should be a single sheet of typewritten thin cheap paper in a brown envelope?
(to be fair, some “advertisers” already do that, to the point of impersonating the courts!)
And if you do meet a North Korean couple in small-town America, they probably won’t mention it! (Un’s uncle and aunt fled there from Switzerland)
unfortunately their current style guide results in this headline.
Yeah, not sure the UK Labour party are going to be receptive to a free speech argument, given recent events. If anything, an updated law might make X liable for the real-world problems it causes.
Politicians and public should consider quitting X, says Liverpool mayor
“The time is approaching where we’ve got to all examine whether we should, en masse, withdraw from it and for there to be a different platform”
If you’re looking to define a new ‘visible minority that suffers online abuse and real-life violence based upon hatred of an out-group’, I’d suggest that cyclists would have a better claim!
Nothing more iconic than “GIVE PEAS A CHANCE”.
(or “PIES” for our northern friends)
re #7, I hope they are also saying no ‘secret questions’ to reset the password?