I freaking knew before I read the description!

NO, GOD, EVERY TIME

Same my friend, same. I’m starting my new factory on Friday and I’m getting ready for the math.

Btw if you’re not already, we’re here at !satisfactory@lemmy.world

Once again the executives punish the workers, as they scramble to figure out why their products won’t sell.

Hot theory, maybe those executives should be the ones leaving, let the workers do what they do best without the limitations put in place by management.

Business continues to realize the limits of the AI hype bubble

I believe so? I think? It’s been a long time. The only thing I could see that would prevent it is if they require a check when launching it, but I remember if you had the disc in that was enough for it before.

Okay the other person is onto the right path but I think it’s important to understand the underlying reasons for how “backwards compatibility” works on the Xbox.

The 360 used a PowerPC architecture, which at the time was very cost effective at the time. Pretty much most things now use x86, our standard 32-bit and 64-bit CPUs are this architecture. (ARM is another type that we are seeing now).

Now, you cannot run code from one PC architecture to another, even emulated this is a very costly procedure, every call to the CPU, every call has to be translated. Even with emulation this is difficult. (Note how we’re still just now getting 360 emulators).

This is mostly why Microsoft and Sony both said no to backwards compatibility, because there was no simple way to take a disc, pop it in, and play.

So after the massive backlash (which they deserved, but also was understandable their point of view), Microsoft created their backward compatibility program. Essentially what they (or developers, not sure who did it) did, was to literally re-compile each entire game for x86, instead of PowerPC. They would then upload the bits to Microsoft, and that is what you download when playing. The disc you insert is purely for checking that you own it, after that you ignore everything else and download the x86 version which is runnable on your console.

So, it stands that backward compatibility wasn’t feasible, it still isn’t “backward compatible”. They rebuilt everything from the source code to run. A pretty massive effort on Microsoft’s part and the developers just so we could play old games. Hopefully you see too why I don’t blame Sony for not going through all of that, it’s a lot of work.

So to answer your questions:

1. Digitally downloaded in x86 with the disc as key
2. No, it is a simple recompile, from the original source code
3. No, since there is only the PowerPC bits on the disc, there is no way to play the game on a newer x86 cpu without downloading the x86 bits
4. They work the same, once compiled for x86 it works for all x86 processors. (Caveats in software engineering of course, but in this case you can assume they are the same)
5. Microsoft went through a ton of effort to get this working, and developers each had to pull up old projects, figure out how to build them again, and did all of this for free. I’m all for hating on Microsoft for a myriad of reasons, but this was a project that had very little profit for them but did the community a huge service. They have my thanks, and Sony has my understanding for why they didn’t do it at the time.

Four in ten employees agree that there has been more discussion about how to implement AI/tech in their workplace than actual change.

Four out of ten people understand how business actually works

Yeah agreed, I’m more surprised they didn’t scrub every reference to it on the training set like you said that it’s in the model at all is surprising. I may try to run it myself and see what it does with the same question

I wonder if that’s a UI block like if it’s mentioned then throw error, or if the model itself has a block in there. From this, it looks like it’s baked in and of course they haven’t poisoned it

Won’t someone please think of the trillion dollar company’s monopoly?!

Zero way they haven’t already been forgotten. Microsoft wants everything online all the time now

Exactly. The whole “emulating the switch” thing for money isn’t just emulation. Emulation has always had a touch of piracy because it involves hacking items to run old games on newer hardware but with the goal of preservation.

Charging anything at all makes it pure piracy, and doing it on their latest games obviously is playing with fire. If you are charging money to play Nintendo’s latest games, I don’t care if you try to label it emulation, that’s pure piracy and you just drew a massive target on your back.

Making a copy of a CD to give to a friend is an annoyance to a company, but you probably aren’t going to be singled out. Making 1000 copies of the CD and charging $2 for each is obviously piracy and you’re going to catch their notice.

I fell in for mixed reality, and I should have known better. They just killed the entire ecosystem. Standard Microsoft behavior

The saving grace now is that you can burn through DA2 in a couple of days if you’re really dedicated to move into inquisition. It’s too bad with the gameplay since there are some hugely key plot points revealed in it

Still desperately trying to get us to leave steam I see

Pfft maybe not the way you use it

Their profits were only slightly last year dude, economy was in shambles. They could only buy the slightly good yacht, not the primo one they actually wanted

Yeah I would immediately return honestly, there are plenty other espresso makers that don’t require wifi

Right? The only ones who can muscle in on the deck are Microsoft and Sony, and that’s only because they have their fan base and users who purchased their games digitally from their stores. Even then, they’re way behind on the Deck.

PC gamers Deck won hands down. I’m happy to see competition, but the Deck won. Everything else right now are the android Honeycomb tablets following the iPad. I’m sure they work fine, but there’s already a winner.

Well, it’s in my back pocket if it comes to that…