No good point, I appreciate discussions!

I think they know if it didn’t exempt city residents there would be enough backlash from eligible voters it wouldn’t pass. Seeing as it’s a fine and not a ban it can have secondary effects of improving safety and the environment but primarily it will raise money.

Well they also exempt taxis and city residents so it’s not about safety or the environment it’s about the money.

It’s also a character in some of their games! 😅

Several vampires and highlanders just woke up with a lot of their cash missing.

Gas and oil execs: “this blows”

I’ll go to YouTube to support kurzgesagt

Clickbait, he tweeted “inaccuracy in the ASUS router tool” later on.

I am not a clever man.

Please read the article before commenting.

upload all the movie films that I downloaded to try to make this right.

😂

I tried grabbing Qbit and all I could find was malware. I used to be so so good at navigating all this stuff and stopped to stream for a little. ☹️

You know what I had forgotten those details. Good recall!

Yeah I thought about the Kirk-Uhura kiss but two things, they aren’t currently openly saying that shouldn’t be allowed (on Fox News) and considering she was a Yeoman or a Lieutenant at the time being kissed by her Captain is right along the “grab em by the pussy” narrative they side with.

You are right if they looked at any of the social establishments that the franchise embraces they would hate it.

My opinion: these hosts have to be so polarized on every opinion that they have to choose a side. Star Trek or Star Wars, she claims to not endorse Star Wars since it’s too “buzzword” and now has to identify as the opposite, despite having no knowledge or affection for the Star Trek franchise. I don’t know if it’s just the screenshot where she’s doing the hand signal backwards, but that’s about the most basic layman Star Trek cultural identifier out there. So of course she doesn’t know they have had non and third gendered species since TOS & Enterprise, along with a myriad of other issues addressed that she would get fired from that channel if she even reported on them as options.

Well… as someone who thinks he spends more money at Starbucks than is smart I’d go as far to say anyone going there is a little dumb lol

She says “no” lol

And yet they still claimed an average of $180,000,000 a year the past 5 years that people didn’t spend.

I’m with you this is something Starbucks probably doesn’t engineer, it’s just people being dumb.

And then Julian’s plan would cause more chaos than had it not been implemented because one person went ahead and returned their cart.

All good, I’m just happy to see more innovation making its way to the public realm.

This isn’t unique to AI, like most LLM programs it’s just accomplishing it faster and on a larger scale. Personally think if you want privacy you should limit the personal things you post to what you’re okay with being out there and form habits such as waiting until home from vacation to post pictures.