![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
Seems like we’re all in agreement that all information should be free, I look forward to them open-sourcing every proprietary bit of code they have
Seems like we’re all in agreement that all information should be free, I look forward to them open-sourcing every proprietary bit of code they have
Is that just for the buttons? I did a one minute eBay search and you can get a pink replacement for every button and the whole shell for $40!
I hope this isn’t too late, but don’t read anything about this game before you play it!
Neat!
Mutation testing is a cool concept, but what’s it got to do with the fediverse?
I’ve never played The Binding of Isaac’s multiplayer, but it’s an incredible game, infinitely replayable, and has full co-op now (as in you each have a full character rather than just “little brother mode”)
Did they learn nothing from Nintendo?
EB bought them and did a “reverse takeover”
TIL!
Definitely not always, I remember buying games and accessories there many moons ago!
This one? Noted!
I do have a Logitech mouse and as far as I’m aware all the buttons are customisable (through their questionable program), so hopefully this is just marketing nonsense
Dedicated AI button: ✋😒
Dedicated change-LED-colour button: 👈😯
They are given cider to help wash down the nettles and relieve the pain.
True athletes
Yeah but seeing actual proof is always important
A bit of that, but hopefully if they piss off too many people they’ll just go elsewhere
Isn’t the real use case just so they don’t have to waste staff time changing labels manually when stock changes or moves?
Yeah I do. They still want to be able to sell their premium subscriptions and not every engineer working on the product is some soulless corpo. If they can break all adblockers without damaging their product they will, but if it fucks things up too much then they’ll go back to the drawing board and try something else.
Hopefully they’ll realise it’s a bigger breaking change than they wanted as part of this testing phase
I’ve seen some comments agreeing with you and others citing examples of individual developers being told not to sell at lower prices. Don’t know if the prosecutor is citing those cases or they’re just a chancer who hasn’t done their research properly.
If this is actually possible then isn’t that a huge security vulnerability in Android and/or iOS? I feel if this was the case we’d be hearing about it from security researchers rather than a lawyer.