As I recall someone made the same lame argument about the name being divisive, a fork was created called Glimpse and it fell on its face not long after it was formed. Things like this are a waste of energy, nobody cares that it’s called gimp.
Find me on Mastodon! @stefenauris@furry.engineer
Mastodon
As I recall someone made the same lame argument about the name being divisive, a fork was created called Glimpse and it fell on its face not long after it was formed. Things like this are a waste of energy, nobody cares that it’s called gimp.
What always amazes me about such things is how easy it is to just keep your mouth shut and not say anything and yet so often people just…don’t.
Good show, only critique I can offer would be a pop-up box asking which kind you want to see first before loading anything
hi guys its just google! so listen we can’t decide on how to brand any of our services so if you don’t like something don’t worry it will be changed in 6 months or less!
Lol okay. Good luck with that
Love it on desktop, so many more features and the UI is super slick. It just doesn’t have an app yet to make it complete
Die? No there’s no way to put that genie back in the bottle. It might just be a little different going forward.
Of course threads would have higher download counts! By now everyone using X already has it installed while threads is a new service so you’d have to install the app to try it. What a brain dead article
Amazing that we’ve reached this point
amazingly useful utility!
Guess they didn’t work hard enough /s
Quite a fascinating read really. It is a shame it didn’t work out but it’s true that once you have investors you’re no longer calling the shots. You’re beholden to that debt, end of story.
Makes sense because google certainly doesn’t support their own shit lol
I doubt they’re missing them. They simply don’t care and will continue to not care until something happens that makes the money generated by the ADs not worth it.
Good luck and good work!
We literally shut down another app doing this last week because it was so sketchy
If you were to copyright AI art who would the credit go to? The original artists the training was based on? The person who created the training model? The person who writes the prompt? The computer itself? I don’t think copyright makes sense in this context
Per WEEK? Wow, that’s so stingy I wouldn’t even bother announcing it lol
This is why when companies merge it’s always a bad thing
I didn’t name it xD